Taylor Swift’s Communications With Blake Lively Are Relevant And NEEDED, Claims Justin Baldoni! Cuz:

Taylor Swift’s Communications With Blake Lively Are Relevant And NEEDED, Claims Justin Baldoni! Cuz:

taylor Swift and Lion Lively are never ever ever getting back together because Travis Kelce’s girlfriend continues to be a player in this legal mess hello my frame it is Perez the queen of all media the original influencer and your number one source for everything it ends with us Saga this morning team Baldon Wayfairer filed a letter to the judge making their case for why they need information from Taylor Swift if you missed my updates on this a little backstory some context headlines were made when Taylor Swift was subpoenaed in this controversy headlines were then made when Taylor Swift’s subpoena was withdrawn why because according to Teen Baldon they got everything they needed dot dot dot or so we thought last week the accused racist lawyer told us that Team Belone Wayfairer was still trying to get information from her about Taylor Swift the gaslighting goddess then went to the court and her new bestie Judge Lyman to try and prevent that and now that leads us to today and a rare redacted letter just a little bit ago Justin’s attorneys told the judge the following we write in opposition to Blake Lively’s motion for a protective order concerning her parentheses relevant communications with Taylor Swift there were multiple things at play in her motion fakeely was trying to prevent Wayfairer from getting her communications with Taylor but also to grant her a protective order if the judge was going to move forward with requiring her to compel and speaking of that in today’s letter quote “The Wayfairer parties also request an order compelling Miss Lively to produce documents relating to her allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation her communications with Miss Swift Sony and WME concerning the same and her claims for economic damages which are responsive to certain requests for production baldoni Wayfairer argues that Miss Lively contends that Miss Swift is not central to Miss Lively’s claims and that the only allegations that were ever remotely relevant to Miss Swift were in the Wayfairer party’s now dismissed complaint rule 26A1 requires parties to disclose the identity of each individual likely to have discoverable information along with the subjects of that information that the disclosing party may use to support its claims or defenses the Wayfairer party’s initial disclosures identify Taylor Swift as having preipient knowledge as to the facts and events alleged in the pleadings in her amended initial disclosures served a week ago Miss Lively identified certain individuals who she believes have discoverable information about her claims and then this next bit is redacted h annoying but I still get the gist of it miss Lively’s council signed her amended initial disclosures thereby certifying that the disclosures therein are complete and correct additionally in her motion Miss Lively does not contend that the production of her communications with Miss Swift relating to it ends with us and this action is disproportional to the needs of the case therefore she should produce team Baldon Wayfairer even cites a ruling from Judge Lyman in a separate case granting motion to compel documents that are relevant and proportional to the needs of the case baldoni Wayfairer also argue Miss Lively’s communications with Taylor Swift are also relevant to Miss Lively’s alleged garden variety emotional distress baldon Wayfairer tells the judge “Miss Lively recently withdrew her claims for intentional infliction of emotional distress and negligent infliction of emotional distress thereafter Miss Lively stated that she still pleads and intends to introduce evidence of garden variety emotional distress in connection with her remaining claims as part of her remaining claims for harassment and retaliation Miss Lively alleges that she has suffered and continues to suffer from severe emotional distress and pain humiliation embarrassment belittlement frustration and mental anguish in an order dated June 10th 2025 the court confirmed that the dismissal of the IED claims did not preclude Lively from offering evidence of garden variety emotional distress here we go if Miss Lively and Miss Swift socialize after the alleged incidents at issue in this case as has been reported the Wayfairer parties are entitled to relevant communications to disprove Miss Lively’s purported emotional distress and Baldoni Wayfair included rulings where social outings were relevant to a case when you are considering issues of emotional distress a little footnote included a link to a People magazine article showing Taylor Swift Travis Kelce and Cespool and his wife going out on a double date back in October of last year baldon Wayfairer also argues that Miss Lively is relying on improper hearsay to shield production of relevant documents quote “The crux of her motion is that because a Daily Mail reporter quoted an unidentified insider as stating that the Wayfairer parties obtained unspecified information from Miss Swift miss Lively should not be compelled to produce relevant communications with Miss Swift in her own possession tellingly Miss Lively does not cite any legal authority for the proposition that such double hearsay is a proper basis to preclude the Wayfairer parties from obtaining relevant discoveries from Miss Lively especially information which the Wayfairer parties believe will further exculpate them in any event council for the Wayfairer parties and Miss Swift both confirmed that no communications between Miss Lively and Miss Swift have been provided to the Wayfairer parties that acknowledgment which Miss Lively is unable to contest refutes her contention that the discovery sought from her is cumulative and duplicative boom fact and thusly warrants the denial of her motion for good measure even assuming the Wayfair parties had received relevant documents from Miss Swift which they have not such hypothetical fact does not relieve Miss Lively from complying with her own obligations under rule 34 to produce documents in her possession and finally Baldoni Wayfairer argues to the judge “It is undisputed that Miss Lively is obligated to produce documents concerning her allegations of sexual harassment and retaliation her communications with Sony which released the film and WME her talent agency concerning the same and her claims for economic damages.” Such documents were demanded in February and Miss Lively responded in March almost three months ago and she’s not handed over anything yet the party’s agreement to produce documents on a rolling basis does not entitle her to withhold relevant information that speaks to the heart of her allegations until the deadline for substantial completion of document discovery which is coming up soon we request the court deny the motion grant the cross motion and direct Miss Lively to immediately produce documents responsive to the request within her possession although we appreciate the positive influence Miss Swift’s music has had on her worldwide audience it was Miss Lively and not the way for her parties that contemporaneously inserted Miss Swift into this dispute and Miss Lively cannot use Miss Swift’s stardom to withhold evidence boom thoughts let’s discuss in the comments

🫖 #TaylorSwift #BlakeLively #JustinBaldoni

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join

Listen to The Perez Hilton Podcast with Chris Booker HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com

Sign up for my Patreon and get lots of exclusive content at http://Patreon.com/PerezHilton

Follow Me!
MAIN CHANNEL: http://youtube.com/PerezHilton
WEBSITE: http://PerezHilton.com
PEREZ’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/PerezHilton
GET A PERSONALIZED VIDEO FROM ME HERE: https://www.cameo.com/perezhilton
LISTEN TO MY PODCAST HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
WEBSITE’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/ThePerezHilton

Check out my merch: http://BuyPopStuff.com

About Perez Hilton:
The original influencer, Perez Hilton founded and oversees one of the most iconic websites ever. In addition to his eponymous blog, he is the host of a very successful podcast, has a loyal following across two YouTube channels, has written four books, has acted in countless TV shows and films – as well as the stage. And, most importantly, he is the proud father of three happy and thriving kids and an adult child, his mother. Perez is one of the most sought after commentators and your best friend!

Taylor Swift’s Communications With Blake Lively Are Relevant And NEEDED, Claims Justin Baldoni! Here’s Why:

Perez Hilton
https://www.youtube.com/perezhilton