Justin Baldoni Is Being ‘Wild’ And ‘Nonsensical’ About Taylor Swift, Claims Blake Lively! Fighting:

Justin Baldoni Is Being ‘Wild’ And ‘Nonsensical’ About Taylor Swift, Claims Blake Lively! Fighting:

i don’t know about you but I’m feeling deja vu because Taylor Swift is dragged into this mess yet again whether she likes it or not she is a key player hello my friend it is Perez the queen of all media the original influencer and your number one source for everything it ends with us saga as I shared with you earlier Justin Baldoni and the Wayfairer parties filed a motion earlier this week to compel sexual harassment Barbies communications with Taylor Swift they very eloquently explained to the judge why this information is relevant and important and shared similar case rulings that proved information like that should be admissible in court very quickly the Garden Variety actress is claiming Garden Variety emotional distress that he caused even though she voluntarily withdrew her claims of emotional distress the judge allowed her to bring up Garden Variety emotional distress in relation to some of her other claims blakey Crocker had some social time with Taylor Swift last fall after all of the It Ends With Us saga first exploded and they were besties were past tense so the communications are very relevant they think and I do too but in a justfiled objection the another simple extortion star is telling the judge no simultaneously while trying to prevent her communications with her former dragon from being entered into this mess she also was seeking a protective order if the judge ruled that she had to supply the text and emails so in Scam Lively’s just filed objection to his wanting to compel these communications her attorney writes “In their opposition the Wayfairer parties improperly cross move to compel various categories of documents by Miss Lively while attempting to oppose Miss Lively’s request for a protective order by distancing themselves from the public representation ations that they had gotten exactly what they were seeking which they do not disclaim in their opposition or in the supporting declaration in connection with the now withdrawn venable and swift subpoenas targeting Miss Swiss Communications as I shared with you all what team Duluist is referencing is this Daily Mail article they ran an exclusive that Baldon and the Wayfairer parties withdrew the Swift subpoena because they got all they needed however that came to the Daily Mail from a source not anybody that was to be attributed on the record meaning not a publicist or a lawyer nobody officially publicly associated with Justin Baldoni so what they just claimed is ridic on brand and they continue as to Miss Lively’s motion for a protective order the Wayfairer parties argue that Miss Lively is bound by her amended initial disclosures to produce all non-privileged communications with Miss Swift they provide no authority for that proposition if including an individual on a party’s initial disclosures binds a party to produce all nonprivileged communications with that individual the wayfairer parties would have agreed to produce all communications as between each of the wayfairer parties on the one hand and the 137 non-wefair parties identified on their initial disclosures on the other they have not okay listen i’m team the truth and fair play good point they continue instead rule 26 contemplates initial disclosures as a mechanism to ensure timely disclosure of names and identifying information for each individual likely to have discoverable information all right and I have no reason to believe they’re lying they’re citing the rulings here to be clear Miss Lively supplemented her initial disclosures to include Miss Swift after the public representations that the Wayfairer parties got exactly what they were seeking were provided with everything that they needed and got exactly what they were hoping for and much more in connection with Miss Swift which suggested that that they would be producing information in connection with the case this bait and switch what bait and switch this bait and switch cannot provide a basis for the wayfairer parties to obtain discovery on what the wayfairer parties supposedly already had babes you just said yourself supposedly based on reporting from the Daily Mail it’s not a bait and switch you shouldn’t believe everything you read they continue the Wayfair party’s speculative argument that Miss Swift’s communications theoretically could have communications relating to Miss Lively’s emotional distress does not change the calculus for starters the Wayfair parties appear to be attempting to bring a cross motion to compel far more than communications with Miss Swift relating to Miss Lively’s emotional distress meaning under the most generous interpretation their attempts as to discovery in connection with Miss Swift are wildly over broad and their focus on emotional distress is simply a post hawk rationalization for these requests further the Wayfairer Party’s position that Miss Lively and Miss Swift socializing at dinner would yield written communications on this topic is nonsensical instead as council for the Wayfairer parties has stated when he recently explained the state of play as to Miss Swift then they include a quote from Brian Freriedman his attorney who’s also my attorney and has not given me any information or influenced me or given me a discount when talking about Taylor Swift Freriedman told Megan Kelly “There’s a short leash on how far we can go with discovery.” I think the judge made has made it very clear that you know third parties need to be directly relevant to claims and we think certain third parties are directly relevant but it’s just whether or not you need that evidence in addition to what you already have so now team Vanzan says for the reasons stated in Miss Lively’s motion the court should hold the wayfairer parties to these public representations he made no representation about what they have in relation to Taylor Swift ridiculous and the court should quote conclude they continue that the issuance of a protective order is appropriate to protect Miss Lively from the unreasonably cumulative and burdensome discovery that as council for the Wayfairer parties appears to recognize additionally with respect to the Wayfairer party’s improper crossotion to compel Miss Lively’s production on various topics the Wayfairer parties have provided no support for their position that Miss Lively must produce some subsets of information in advance of others as they are well aware despite being a single individual Miss Lively has produced substantially more documents in this case than the numerous wayfairer parties have produced at this juncture miss Lively additionally made a production on Friday and has committed to regular productions to satisfy her substantial completion obligations by July 1st to reiterate Miss Lively had already agreed to timely produce this information starting even before the July 1st deadline meaning the Wayfairer party’s motion was eminently baseless when filed and should be denied additionally she complains to the judge that the Wayfairer parties have not given her quote all footage related to the film which she is quote entitled to review in advance of any deposition wasn’t she in the editing bay didn’t she have all the footage well they better get that resolved ASAP because as I told you in my video earlier today about the saga her deposition is scheduled for this coming Monday and no matter how much she tries to fight I think Taylor Communications are going to be a part of this what do you think let’s discuss in the comments section

🗣️ #TaylorSwift #BlakeLively #JustinBaldoni

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join

Listen to The Perez Hilton Podcast with Chris Booker HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com

Sign up for my Patreon and get lots of exclusive content at http://Patreon.com/PerezHilton

Follow Me!
MAIN CHANNEL: http://youtube.com/PerezHilton
WEBSITE: http://PerezHilton.com
PEREZ’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/PerezHilton
GET A PERSONALIZED VIDEO FROM ME HERE: https://www.cameo.com/perezhilton
LISTEN TO MY PODCAST HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
WEBSITE’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/ThePerezHilton

Check out my merch: http://BuyPopStuff.com

About Perez Hilton:
The original influencer, Perez Hilton founded and oversees one of the most iconic websites ever. In addition to his eponymous blog, he is the host of a very successful podcast, has a loyal following across two YouTube channels, has written four books, has acted in countless TV shows and films – as well as the stage. And, most importantly, he is the proud father of three happy and thriving kids and an adult child, his mother. Perez is one of the most sought after commentators and your best friend!

Justin Baldoni Is Being ‘Wild’ And ‘Nonsensical’ About Taylor Swift, Claims Blake Lively! Fighting Back, She:

Perez Hilton
https://www.youtube.com/perezhilton