Justin Baldoni’s Legal Team Is “Adversarial” And “Unreliable”, Claims Blake Lively’s Publicist! So:

Justin Baldoni’s Legal Team Is “Adversarial” And “Unreliable”, Claims Blake Lively’s Publicist! So:

This is why it pays off to read everything. Sometimes you find the most delicious details in the peripheral. Hello my friend. It is Perez, the queen of all media, the original influencer, and your number one source for everything. It ends with us saga. A couple of updates in this video. First, a brief one. A friend of mine who’s following my coverage and is also into sports, not me, sent me a link with the headline that reads, quote, “Caleb Williams teams up with Tom Brady’s former publicist, Stephanie Jones, for an image makeover in his second year.” Oh, how nice to see Stephanie Jones getting work still. Good luck to this Caleb fella. Not sure how long he’ll be working with her. Some of you might remember Stephanie Jones. She is currently suing Justin Baldon and is his former publicist. She’s claiming breach of contract. He’s claiming you sucked. You didn’t listen. You were fired for cause. Plus, Stephanie Jones is at the center of all of those text messages and emails that were improperly taken from Jen Ael, his current publicist, who used to work for Stephanie Jones. And yeah, Stephanie Jones is no longer Tom Brady’s publicist, but somebody’s clearly still milking that connection cuz uh a story like this, I’m not going to say for sure, but seemingly planted. And I don’t know, Jack, about Caleb Williams. Why does he need an image rehab? I don’t even care to Google it. Not my beat. This is and let’s get back to it. Last week I told you all that a reporter for the Daily Mail has been dragged into all of this drama and his lawyer submitted a letter to the judge asking for some more time to properly object to the subpoena from Dulu’s publicist. We’ve now gotten that and it’s juicy. First, they make a lot of sense. The lawyer for James Vosushka says that Leslie Sloan’s subpoena is inconsistent with the federal rules of civil procedure, the local rules of the Southern District of New York. That they impose discovery burdens on him greater than those warranted by Vituska’s status as a non-party being subpoenaed, meaning he’s not part of this lawsuit. They object because the subpoena was vague. They object because the subpoena calls for documents or information that is not relevant nor proportional to the needs of the case. They object because the subpoena is duplicative and incomprehensible. This one might be a bit of a stretch. The reporter objects because the subpoena is overly broad. And this is perhaps the best argument. The alleged racists publicist Leslie Sloan is asking for communications beginning in December of 2022. What? As we know, filming on It Ends With Us and pre-production where everything kicked off, that all didn’t happen until 2023. Why does Leslie Sloan need any emails or texts from 2022? Additionally, and this is very strong, they argue, “Sorry, this is protected. This is privileged. This is reporters privilege as grounded in the first amendment.” They also object because there is some attorney client privilege and work product doctrine happening. They object because there’s information that is confidential and or proprietary. There’s some lawyering here. They object because they use the word all documents. They object because of some of the definitions of things in the subpoena such as communication document. And perhaps the second strongest argument they make is the Sloan parties are seeking to compel the reporter to hand over information that can be easily subpoenenaed by one of the parties to the lawsuit. In the latest filing with the judge, James’s lawyer says that earlier this week on May 27th, his lawyer and reps for Leslie Sloan had a 90minute meet and confer to attempt to resolve the subpoena. And while some progress was made, they claim that Leslie Sloan’s request is still overly broad and not necessary. In their latest filing, they say the Sloan parties can obtain communications with the wayfairer parties and documents concerning the wayfarer parties directly from the wayfarer parties. They give us some tea of what happened in their meet and confer earlier this week. They say the Daily Mail’s attorney, in fact, during the meet and confer, the Sloan parties admitted they requested this discovery pertaining to the Daily Mail reporter from the Wayfairer parties, but are still negotiating with and have not moved to compel this information from them. Instead, the Sloan parties claim to need this discovery from Mr. Vushka because the parties are adversarial to one another and therefore the wayfairer parties cannot serve as a reliable source for the information sought. How is that different than any other lawsuit? Seems to me like Leslie Sloan and her legal team are trying to circumvent the process of how things are done. Kind of like the Vanzan CEO did to get her subpoena for Stephanie Jones’s materials, which they were already aware of. They just needed them and a legal excuse to have them. So the reporter’s lawyer says because the Sloan parties must but have failed to first seek the discovery from the wayfairer parties before burdening Mr. Vituska a nonparty the letter motion should be denied and the subpoena should be squashed. They re-emphasize that the materials wanted constitutes unpublished news gathering materials which are protected by the reporter’s privilege under both federal and state law. Then they cite the cases, the codes, the law. Yes, the Sloan parties have not and cannot overcome the privilege because they have not attempted to obtain the information from another source or shown that they cannot obtain the information from another source, namely the wayfairer parties. This alone is fatal to their letter motion. They also assert contrary to the Sloan party’s assertion that the privilege does not apply to all of Vituska’s conversations simply because he happens to be a journalist. Letter motion at three, the reporter’s privilege contemplates exactly that. And because some of the requests in the subpoena are not even within a time frame, such as all communications with Melissa Nathan without date limitation or connection to the parties of the film, the subpoena is over broad and should be squashed. That all seems very reasonable to me. If I was Judge Lyman, I would say one more meet and confer. And if you can’t figure it out, then quashed. Thoughts on everything?

👨‍⚖️ #BlakeLively #JustinBaldoni #TaylorSwift

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join

Listen to The Perez Hilton Podcast with Chris Booker HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com

Sign up for my Patreon and get lots of exclusive content at http://Patreon.com/PerezHilton

Follow Me!
MAIN CHANNEL: http://youtube.com/PerezHilton
WEBSITE: http://PerezHilton.com
PEREZ’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/PerezHilton
GET A PERSONALIZED VIDEO FROM ME HERE: https://www.cameo.com/perezhilton
LISTEN TO MY PODCAST HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
WEBSITE’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/ThePerezHilton

Check out my merch: http://BuyPopStuff.com

About Perez Hilton:
The original influencer, Perez Hilton founded and oversees one of the most iconic websites ever. In addition to his eponymous blog, he is the host of a very successful podcast, has a loyal following across two YouTube channels, has written four books, has acted in countless TV shows and films – as well as the stage. And, most importantly, he is the proud father of three happy and thriving kids and an adult child, his mother. Perez is one of the most sought after commentators and your best friend!

Justin Baldoni’s Legal Team Is “Adversarial” And “Unreliable”, Claims Blake Lively’s Publicist! Boo Hoo! So Now:

Perez Hilton
https://www.youtube.com/perezhilton