Is This Wrong? Blake Lively:

Is This Wrong? Blake Lively:

She keeps losing and I love it. It brings me joy. Is that wrong? If it’s wrong to celebrate her losses, I don’t want to be right. First, I teamed up with the ACLU of Nevada to beat baseless Blake in court. And now she’s lost again. I can get used to this. Hello, my friend. It is Perez, the queen of all media, the original influencer and your number one source for everything it ends with us saga. Two updates in this one video. First, in a moment of rare accord, the actress of untraceable talent and Jed Wallace, Justin Baldon’s digital social media mastermind have agreed on a joint stipulation. And that in and of itself is somewhat interesting. But what’s really interesting to me is the details. You know what they say, the devil is in the details. So, we have learned that team Kaka has been unable to depose Jed Wallace, and I’ll share why in a moment, but lawyer filed a letter with Judge Lyman over the weekend. Must have been real important, right? They tell her lap dog, quote, “Plaintiff Blake Lively respectfully submits the forthcoming joint stipulation reflecting her agreement with defendant Jed Wallace on a mutually agreeable date for his deposition in the above captioned matter and a proposed order extending the case management and scheduling order to facilitate that deposition occurring. after the existing cutoff date. Rules for thee, but not for me. And obviously, if the judge is going to extend deposition for Jed Wallace to be deposed, Taylor Swift, Taylor Swift, she should be deposed as well. Extend it for both sides. The Garden Variety actress’s legal team tells Judge Lyman, “Council for Miss Lively and Mr. Wallace have conferred for several months in an effort to identify a mutually agreeable date for Mr. Wallace’s deposition in light of his temporary unavailability for the reasons set forth in the joint stipulation and proposed order. good cause exists to enter the proposed order for the reasons stated therein and because Miss Lively has been generally diligent with respect to the scheduling of Mr. Wallace’s deposition and the need for more time was not only not foreseeable nor her fault but the result of an effort to accommodate Mr. Wallace’s need to sit later in the schedule than Miss Lively would otherwise have preferred. Council for Miss Lively have also conferred with counsel for the remaining defendants who do not oppose entry of the proposed order. Oh, okay. Wait, I’m confused now. I’m confused. The high school graduates legal team already asked Judge Lyman for an extension which he granted and unless I’m remembering wrong, that was until October the 10th. This deposition says it’s supposed to happen on October the 9th. So why are they asking for an extension. I don’t I’m confused because I’m just rereading the letter and it says scheduling to facilitate that deposition occurring after the existing cutoff date. The cutoff date is October the 10th, is it not? Ah, thank God my OCD was killing me. The joint stipulation addresses this. It says, “Whereas on September 12th, 2025, the court granted Miss Lively a 10day extension of the deadline to complete the depositions of defendants Steve Sorowitz, Jamie Heath, and Justin Baldon from September 30th, 2025 to October 10th, 2025. This is but actually this is confusing me even more. the court, I don’t think I don’t recall being explicit saying, “Okay, we’re only granting this extension just for those depositions.” I just assumed they could depose anybody until October 10th. But I guess that’s not accurate. And you know what? That’s not even the most interesting bit. The truly juicy part of this is the bit that’s redacted. Many of you know that previously the Sham Poo company owner doxed Jed Wallace’s health information. And I’m pretty sure the redacted bit has to do with a health issue of Jed Wallace’s a surgery or recovering from surgery. My guess is surgery like blank surgery because it’s pretty short what’s redacted. Look, Miss Lively blah blah blah seeking to accommodate both the crowded deposition schedule in late September and early October and also to accommodate Mr. Wallace’s temporary unavailability through midepptember due to back surgery, heart surgery, knee surgery, something surgery. The only reason I’m speculating that is cuz that bruha let us know about his health issues already. But this all was just the appetizer, my friend. Are you ready for the main course? As I previously shared with you all, the second wife of Ryan Reynolds has been attempting to get information from the private investigators of Baldon’s lawyer. That’s right. She literally subpoenaed PIs hired by Brian Freriedman who is also my lawyer but was not helping me with subpoena gate cuz that would have been so expensive. Now I am in my Lwoods era and it seemed apparent to me that that subpoena should be quashed. The information was highly relevant to attorney client privilege and work product. But unfortunately, the private investigators sourced intelligence fought the subpoena in the place of compliance in California, but the judge there transferred it over to New York. and my former nemesis, the judge overseeing that trial. And I wasn’t sure if Lyman would do the right thing or not. However, her lap dog just issued a ruling on this. And let’s get into it. Lyman says, quote, “Movement plaintiff Blake Lively has filed a motion pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 45D2BI seeking an order compelling respondent sourced intelligence LLC to comply with a thirdparty subpoena issued on June 13, 2025. The motion to compel was originally filed in the United States District Court for the Central District of California, the district where compliance is required. On September 4th, 2025, Magistrate Judge A. Joel Ricklin issued a memorandum decision and order transferring the motion to this district. On September 15th, 2025, the case was transferred to this court. The court now denies Lively’s motion. And let’s get into the why. Daddy Lyman says, “Rule 26 governs the scope of discovery.” Quote, “A party may obtain discovery regarding any nonprivileged matter that is relevant to any party’s claim or defense and proportional to the needs of the case. The party issuing the subpoena must demonstrate that the information sought is relevant and material to the allegations and claims at issue in the proceedings. Lively I added the law part. Lively has not demonstrated that sourced intelligence is likely to have nonprivileged information relevant to any claim in the underlying action. The basis for Lively’s current request is that sourced intelligence was purportedly involved in an alleged online smear campaign against her in retaliation for her claims of discrimination. Did the judge just telegraph where he’s currently sitting and how he thinks about everything? He said her claims of discrimination, not her claims of sh harassment. H. He continues, “Lively, however, has profered no facts to support her suspicion that sourced intelligence was involved in the conduct she alleges to have been wrongful.” She states only that one of the agents who participated in the alleged smear campaign may be sourced intelligence and that sourced intelligence may have been engaged in the same type of online activity this court has already held is not privileged or protected. Well, Judgy Pooh says mere speculation cannot support discovery. He also says Lively further asserts that sourced intelligence was retained by council for the wayfairer parties for the benefit of the wayfairer parties and that sourced intelligence specializes in reputation management and digital erasure. So that’s not illegal. Lyman continues, “But sourced intelligence has submitted a sworn declaration from its founding partner that it was engaged by council for the wayfairer parties only in late 2024. Remember, the another simple extortion actress has told the court that the alleged smear campaign began in August of 2024. And the judge says and seems to have been convinced that sourced intelligence was retained many months after that. And he continues that it the intelligence agency was asked to perform investigative services regarding certain persons or companies it understood to be connected to the lawsuit Lively filed against the wayfairer parties. Vanzan the Vanzan scam of it all. That would have been money well spent. And more investigation is needed, I think. And the judge’s ruling continues. Sourced intelligence said that it prepared investigative background reports and provided those reports to council. The founding partner specifically denies that sourced intelligence performed any services related to social media. monitoring influence operations, digital erasure or web monitoring, or that it performed any services connected to the digital campaign alleged by Lively. Furthermore, the only request for production in the subpoena directly targeted quote at efforts to seed, influence, encourage, create, purchase, manipulate, boost, amplify, facilitate, or engage with social media and sourced intelligence has represented that no documents responsive to that request exist. The organically disliked Lively is obsessed with me and my fellow creator journalists. I’m flattered. Ew. Sorry. Taking a back. Therefore, the judge wraps things up saying the motion to compel is accordingly denied. The clerk of court is respectfully directed to close this matter. And you know what? I think Judge Lyman would look lovely in my new Grab Your Friends, Wear Your Florals collection. That’s right. I’m selling that and you can buy it at bypopstuff.com. That’s bypop.com. Also, life is hectic. You’re busy. Make sure you stay informed and entertained and get an exclusive podcast a week from me and my awesome co-host on our Patreon. Sign up today at patreon.com/p to the e to the r to the e to the z to the h to the i to the l to the t to the o to the n. And if you like this video, you might enjoy your own video for you, a loved one, somebody you hate for whatever occasion. I make personalized vids on the Cameo website, book one right now at cameo.com/p to the e to the r to the e to the z to the h to the i to the l to the t to the o to the n. And thank you for watching until the end. You are a superstar member of my fram. If you are still watching here, say nose job. And thoughts on where we’re at in this saga, thoughts on these latest developments, thoughts on anything and everything. Let’s discuss it all in the comments section.

👨‍⚖️ #BlakeLively #JustinBaldoni #TaylorSwift

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join

Listen to The Perez Hilton Podcast with Chris Booker HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com

Sign up for my Patreon and get lots of exclusive content at http://Patreon.com/PerezHilton

Follow Me!
MAIN CHANNEL: http://youtube.com/PerezHilton
WEBSITE: http://PerezHilton.com
PEREZ’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/PerezHilton
GET A PERSONALIZED VIDEO FROM ME HERE: https://www.cameo.com/perezhilton
LISTEN TO MY PODCAST HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
WEBSITE’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/ThePerezHilton

Check out my merch: http://BuyPopStuff.com

About Perez Hilton:
The original influencer, Perez Hilton founded and oversees one of the most iconic websites ever. In addition to his eponymous blog, he is the host of a very successful podcast, has a loyal following across two YouTube channels, has written four books, has acted in countless TV shows and films – as well as the stage. And, most importantly, he is the proud father of three happy and thriving kids and an adult child, his mother. Perez is one of the most sought after commentators and your best friend!

Is This Wrong? Blake Lively:

Perez Hilton
https://www.youtube.com/perezhilton