Bridgerton is once again facing criticism for its treatment of actors of color, particularly darker-skinned leads, following Monday’s release of the new TV tie-in book cover and the announcement of Bridgerton Season 4’s premiere dates. Fans noticed that Kate Sharma (Simone Ashley) and Simon Basset (Regé-Jean Page), both darker-skinned leads, are the only ones whose names don’t appear on their covers, unlike Penelope (Nicola Coughlan) and Sophie (Yerin Ha), whose names are clearly displayed.

    Per Feminegra:

    “The book controversy sits within a wider marketing problem that Bridgerton has yet to fix. Kate and Anthony’s season never received a major joint photoshoot or magazine feature, unlike other couples who graced Vogue and Town & Country. When Redbubble released official merchandise, Penelope and Colin appeared as a romantic illustration while Kate, the Indian Viscountess, was reduced to a green dinosaur. The ad was approved by Netflix’s marketing partners and circulated without revision.

    The omission of names and titles is part of a larger pattern that stretches across Shondaland’s empire. Ruby Barker, who played Marina, has spoken openly about the lack of support she received while enduring racist harassment and mental health struggles. Regé-Jean Page faced the same silence when he chose to leave after Season 1. Simone Ashley experienced a more insidious version of that exclusion as her screen time and visibility fell despite her success as a leading lady.

    The new Bridgerton book covers have done more than reignite aesthetic debate—they expose how Netflix’s approach to representation remains uneven. Simon and Kate, once promoted as symbols of progress, remain unnamed on their own stories. One could argue that in the original book covers, only Book 4 included both romantic leads because Penelope had appeared since the first novel, and Netflix followed that same format for Seasons 3 and 4. Yet even if the naming choice follows publishing logic, the pattern lands differently when viewed alongside how the series continues to treat its darker-skinned cast, leaving many unconvinced that this omission is purely procedural.”

    Posted by idontwantafollowing

    Share.

    14 Comments

    1. Unable_Mushroom9355 on

      This is interesting. The “Penelope and Colin’s Story” title makes perfect sense, as Penelope was already an established and loved character. Had they then gone back to “Benedict’s Story,” this would have been consistent. Why the new precedent?

    2. This series is historically inaccurate! Everyone knows people from that time period weren’t that good looking

    3. Not included in the article but I also find it interesting that although most of the promo shots of Benedict and Sophie have them both wearing masquerade masks, the new book covers picks the one image where Sophie is wearing a mask but Benedict is unmasked. With all the other details in the article, it’s hard not to feel like they’re trying to downplay the fact that Yerin Ha is South Korean.

    4. WilliamsRutherford on

      I know colour blind roles allow for more jobs for actors that are POC….but I hate that it still results in the erasing of non-white culture and the assimilation of POC into a white narrative. 

      I really am a fan of culture conscious tv/movies….Interview with the Vampire did this brilliantly….and check-out “Small Island”, a period piece by BBC/Masterpiece that really tells the story of West Indians in the UK!

    5. pricelessmoments on

      There are so many (very good) romance novel series written about PoC by authors of color! We can have more than one romance adaptation, not just Bridgerton/spinoffs!

    6. At first I thought, “oh maybe they decided to change direction on the subheadings of each book through the years,” but no, this is a recent bundle release. What is the logic???

    7. Brilliant_Concern_79 on

      The fact that by now they must be aware of the mounting criticism and they continue to do this is truly baffling to me 

    8. NectarineDangerous57 on

      All of this highlights the importance of having POC involved in all aspects of the creation, in this case, advertising and marketing.

    9. Isn’t this a bit of stretch when talking about the books though? The books are completely different from the show. No colorism there. No color at all. Everyone is white. This is kinda crazy to complain about the books because all of these characters in these books are white people, regardless of whose name is on the cover.

    10. Awkward-Bear-2344 on

      Showrunners are a part of the conversations for tie-in art, specifically for reprint of book cover art. It’s also interesting how these colorism conversations, and in looking at Shonda’s recent commentary on Grey’s are never pointed at her for accountability…the call is coming from inside.

    Leave A Reply