This Is Hilarious! Blake Lively’s Very Expensive Lawyers Called Out By The Judge! Take A Big Loss!
Breaking news and it’s the good kind. Hello my fram. It is Perez, the queen of all media, the original influencer and your number one source for everything. It ends with us saga. I enjoy these so much more when we have a win. And we did it yesterday. I told you then that Beldoni and his co-producer on It Ends With Us, Jamie Heath, suffered a devastating, humiliating, inappropriate loss. The judge ruled that his producing partner Jaime Heath has to hand over to Ezra’s cash cow intimate home video of Jaime’s wife giving birth. Even though Jamie said he did not show any video of the birth, it was just postbirth. A lot of folks think this is inappropriate. Not very women forward, women centric, women supporting women. Gross, nasty ick. Well, unfortunately for the critically acclaimed Teen Choice Award winner, things did not go her way today. As many of you know, since last year, Belon and the Wayfairer defendants have used Melissa Nathan, the crisis communications expert, and her company TAG, the agency group. Bland Boozley went after sanctions against Melissa Nathan as well because of redactions. Remember this? We went over it. Too much redactions. Unnecessary redactions. Redaction. Redaction. Well, my former arch nemesis, Judge Lyman, just issued a ruling on redaction gate. Big L. Let’s get into it. Lewis J. Lyman, United States District Judge. Plaintiff Blake Lively moves to sanction defendant Melissa Nathan for purportedly violating this court’s order dated August 27th, 2025, which among other things directed that Nathan modify the redactions in her previous productions to replace blackbox redactions with textbox redactions, indicating the reason for the redaction. The court granted that relief as unopposed. Lively now asserts that Nathan is in violation of the order because Nathan’s revised redactions were over broad and therefore still improper. Nathan responds that she replaced blackbox redactions with textbox redactions and that the order required no more. The motion for sanctions is denied. Why? Judge Lyman says on August 4th, 2025, Lively moved to compel the Wayfairer parties to produce certain documents and to correct other discovery deficiencies. as relevant here. Lively sought to compel the wayfairer parties and Nathan in particular to comply with the party’s previous agreement that any documents produced in discovery would indicate on their face the basis for redactions meaning why. And by the way, the irony of it all, the mistress of misrepresentation loves redactions. She has overly used redactions way more than Wayfairer, I think. How about you? you lively contended that Nathan’s production failed to indicate the basis for withholding information and that Nathan should be ordered to do so. Lively’s reply memorandum of law made no further mention of improper redactions. Ezra Mikey. In response to the motion to compel, the Wayfairer parties asserted that they would modify the redactions in their previous productions as necessary to replace blackbox redactions with textbox red. This is just I still think this is just all so ridiculous and very on brand for team ridicula. In response to the motion to compel, the Wayf Farer parties asserted that they would modify the redactions in their previous productions as necessary to replace blackbox redactions with textbox redactions indicating the reason for redaction where applicable and reproduce the affected documents. In its order addressing the motion to compel, the court noted the wayfairer party’s nonopposition to providing revised redactions and it granted the motion on that basis. Nathan subsequently produced documents bearing revised textbox redactions. Lively now contends that those revised redactions were improperly over broad and therefore failed to comply with the order. Lively notes, for example, that certain materials Nathan has redacted as nonresponsive are in fact relevant and responsive, as indicated by the fact that other parties have produced the same materials in unredacted form. Contrary to Lively’s suggestion, the order did not compel the production of documents bearing blackbox reductions. Rather, given Lively’s framing of the issue and the Wayfairer party’s corresponding response, the court’s directive that Nathan address her improper redactions meant that Nathan was required to provide revised textbox redactions explaining the reasons for any redactions. There is no dispute that Nathan did so. But Lively now asserts that Nathan’s revised redactions are over broad and therefore traded one deficiency for another. But the time to raise that argument was before the close of fact discovery. There is no contention that Nathan provided her revised redactions after the close of fact discovery, which might excuse the motions untimeliness. On the contrary, Lively’s council conferred with council for the wayfairer parties regarding the revised reductions on September 24th, 2025, approximately 1 week before the end of fact discovery. Lively asserts that council for the wayfairer parties were not prepared to discuss the redactions at that time. But if that is correct, the appropriate course of action would have been to file a motion to compel before fact discovery ended, not to wait over a month before raising the issue for the court for the first time. Because the order did not require the production of the redacted documents, only additional explanation for their redaction. And because Lively had an opportunity to contest the revised redactions prior to the close of fact discovery, but did not do so. Her motion for sanctions is denied. Ah, the clerk of court is respectfully directed to close the motion at docket number 900. So ordered, Lewis J. Lyman. I especially love that this order, the judge’s ruling today, was mainly about lackluster lawyering. Ezra, Lil Lion, Mikey. You could have gotten this for your client, but you sucked too hard. So ordered. And I order everybody to at least consider checking out my team truth. I organically dislike you. Grab your friends, wear your florals, and greater than my haters merch. Plus more. All of that available right now at bypopstuff.com. That’s bypopstuff.com. Plus, you can get me. Did you know that I am available for you on the Cameo website to make personalized videos? I can say happy birthday, merry Christmas, felis navididad, joyous kwanza, greetings this Hanukkah, whatever you want. Book a personalized video from me on the Cameo website at cameo.com/myame. P to the E to the R to the E to the Z to the H to the I to the L to the T to the O to the N. Also, you can read my website for free every day throughout the day. Check it out. My name P to the E to the R to the E to the Z to the H the I to the T O to the N. Plus, if you like my podcast, get our Patreon to enjoy an exclusive episode a week and chat with us every day on the message board. Sign up right now at patreon.com/myame pet to the e r the i l o to the end. And if you watched until here, the end, you are a superstar. You are the 1%. Thank you. Hit that like button, share this video, and in the comments section, say haha. Haha. In the comments section, thoughts. Let’s discuss it all down below. Thank you for watching.
๐จโโ๏ธ #BlakeLively #JustinBaldoni #RyanReynolds
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join
Listen to The Perez Hilton Podcast with Chris Booker HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
Sign up for my Patreon and get lots of exclusive content at http://Patreon.com/PerezHilton
Follow Me!
MAIN CHANNEL: http://youtube.com/PerezHilton
WEBSITE: http://PerezHilton.com
PEREZ’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/PerezHilton
GET A PERSONALIZED VIDEO FROM ME HERE: https://www.cameo.com/perezhilton
LISTEN TO MY PODCAST HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
WEBSITE’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITEโS TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/ThePerezHilton
Check out my merch: http://BuyPopStuff.com
About Perez Hilton:
The original influencer, Perez Hilton founded and oversees one of the most iconic websites ever. In addition to his eponymous blog, he is the host of a very successful podcast, has a loyal following across two YouTube channels, has written four books, has acted in countless TV shows and films – as well as the stage. And, most importantly, he is the proud father of three happy and thriving kids and an adult child, his mother. Perez is one of the most sought after commentators and your best friend!
This Is Hilarious! Blake Lively’s Very Expensive Lawyers Just Called Out By The Judge! Take A Stinging Loss!
Perez Hilton
https://www.youtube.com/perezhilton

30 Comments
Enjoy my channel? Become a member! Your support would be SO APPRECIATED! Plus, you'd get a badge that shows up every time you comment, access to my members-only lives every weekday at 1:00 PM EST and more! Sign up to get access to all the perks HERE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join
Support by reading my website! It's free! http://PerezHilton.com
Get a personalized video from me at http://Cameo.com/PerezHilton
Also, check out my official merch at http://BuyPopStuff.com
And enjoy our Patreon at http://Patreon.com.com/PerezHilton
Hahaha!!!! โค
Ezra's CASH COW๐ ๐๐คฃ๐คฃ๐คฃ๐๐๐
Blakeโs new name: Blake โBlack Box Betty Boozeโ Lively
You have to be some kind of evil to deliberately and strategically inflict this amount of pain n another human being. They completely circled Baldoniโs whole life, took away everything he treasured, pod cast mate Liz Plank, alienated the entire cast and Colleen Hoover, inch by inch, foot by foot, script takeovers, editing takeover, Blake directing the entire dance scene, Sony dancing to their tune, removing his name and pic from everything, publicly calling him a sexual predator, getting him fired from his agency and the spiteful demonic cherry on the top? Creating a whole character in Ryanโs block buster movie to publicly shame Baldoni in front of hundreds of millions. An unhinged level of jealousy on Ryanโs part. This was a long game, strategically and well thought out like chess. Demonic, dusting and evil.
And BL still doesnt understand why people organically hate her? Either she's playing stupid or she really is THAT stupid ๐
Oh, my goodness, if Blake was traumatized seeing the mother, dad and baby, she better not attend any living nativity scenes this Christmas!
Ha ha Ha!
Blake is a massive โฌโฌโฌโฌ!
Snake is a real pos !!! It should be held by the judge let her view it if she must – I know she was told by the judge this can never come out to the public . But is Blake going to make a copy of the private video ? It makes me very angry about the home video !
The Judge and Blake Lively and her lawyers have decided to violate Jamie Heaths wife. It is beyond inappropriate. It is grotesque and obscene and I think the Judge should be reported.
ha ha ha ๐ itโs always a good day when team delulu gets denied
All she has done is continue to show us what a nasty,got tags on herself kind of person she is! I no longer watch any movies with her or her husband in them. She needs so much humbling!
Thank you! ๐
Hahaha ๐
Litigious Lively trying to turn a birthing scene into porn is peak delusion.
Ha ha ha!!!!!
๐๐๐๐
How could someone be so insufferable It has to suck to be her . I dont care how much Gucci,Chanel ,shiny shoes , or Ballenciaga she wears her soul is ugly and is scum of the earth
Didn't understand any of what you just read but you make it hell funny!!
That judge is a freaking psycho!!!
Who cares? This is a nothing burger. If you are celebrating this as a win, you must be desperate.
She was fully dressed when doing the birthing scene.
We will see if this will help Justin Baldoni win this case.
HAH HAH HAH
Ha ha ha โฅ๏ธ
Ha ha ha!!!!
This is what missing a deadline really looks like – wonder if TMZ will report on this ๐
๐๐๐
If blake was uncomfortable with the birth scene, why didn't she walk off the set. Blake is not someone to stay quiet. She voces her opinion. Is there a union rep to talk with.