You can totally release 30 films a year. NONE will be good but it’s totally doable.
naitsirt89 on
Why stop at 30? How about 100?
wraithius on
Especially if they’re walking around thinking all of the current top content is too woke. Unless you don’t mind releasing 30 films that _aren’t very good_.
urbanlife78 on
How many will be premiere AI Slop films?
sucobe on
52 weeks in a year. 30 films all competing for screen time and viewer engagement. What’s the opposite of tent pole films?
Algae_Mission on
Does anyone really believe this guy?
OverPotato2322 on
The Elon Musk of Hollywood (let’s see how long he lasts when the AI bubble pops and his daddy loses money)
MovieENT1 on
It’s probably not unrealistic given the infrastructure they’re buying. Paramount and Warner Brothers infrastructure can each put out 15 movies and there’s the 30 right there. Paramount as it is now would struggle though, obviously. WB is major though, they could prob put out 5 movies a year just based on DC stuff.
United_Efficiency330 on
Good luck with that. Even when the film industry was at its zenith – during the 1930s/1940s – MGM’s original goal of a full length feature film EVERY week was too far fetched.
G-Unit11111 on
You can release as many films as you want, but who wants to watch all of them?
Joey-WilcoXXX on
And you’re broke. Can’t forget that the company is broke.
ExpatHist on
Releasing 30 bad movies in a year is totally doable in today’s digital age.
Darkdragoon324 on
He probably intends a lot of it to be AI slop.
BigB0iBuster on
And I want the stupid piggy to shut his fucking slophole.
But we can’t get everything we want in life
mattyGOAT1996 on
And most of them with Ted Nugent, Roseanne, and Kevin Sorbo.
ACW1129 on
Larry’s the real CEO.
Fire_Z1 on
All movies have to be approved by the Saudi government. Definitely going slow down the the 30 movies annually
noctalla on
A delusional rich boy who doesn’t understand reality because he’s lived in an artificial bubble his whole life.
bforce1313 on
How many are propaganda?
PKblaze on
It’s doable on a large scale. So long as you have enough people and money. Whether Paramount can do it… I doubt.
vroart on
Even if it’s 30 children film an audience that consumes consumes consumes….. they would eventually cannibalize each other.
The 90s had more movies than today…. Because of indie films and import markets. And even then it was 25 million weekend was a successful weekend.
Slow-King-3086 on
He can release as many as he wants- he still needs an audience.
I won’t be in it.
DetailHour4884 on
The old, tried and true, quantity over quality methods. Nothing beats inundating any market with slop.
CommitteeMain1430 on
Not if you have an Awesome-o robot!
One-Author2996 on
Perhaps one day David will turn into a real boy.
Beneficial-Jury484 on
Will those also be financed 49.5% by foreign companies?
Does that 49.5% buy them approval of what can be said and done in the movies?
Brave_Analyst7540 on
By the way… worth pointing out that nothing has been stopping him from doing that with Paramount alone.
30 Comments
Try for a couple of good ones and see how it goes
He sure is a trump
You can totally release 30 films a year. NONE will be good but it’s totally doable.
Why stop at 30? How about 100?
Especially if they’re walking around thinking all of the current top content is too woke. Unless you don’t mind releasing 30 films that _aren’t very good_.
How many will be premiere AI Slop films?
52 weeks in a year. 30 films all competing for screen time and viewer engagement. What’s the opposite of tent pole films?
Does anyone really believe this guy?
The Elon Musk of Hollywood (let’s see how long he lasts when the AI bubble pops and his daddy loses money)
It’s probably not unrealistic given the infrastructure they’re buying. Paramount and Warner Brothers infrastructure can each put out 15 movies and there’s the 30 right there. Paramount as it is now would struggle though, obviously. WB is major though, they could prob put out 5 movies a year just based on DC stuff.
Good luck with that. Even when the film industry was at its zenith – during the 1930s/1940s – MGM’s original goal of a full length feature film EVERY week was too far fetched.
You can release as many films as you want, but who wants to watch all of them?
And you’re broke. Can’t forget that the company is broke.
Releasing 30 bad movies in a year is totally doable in today’s digital age.
He probably intends a lot of it to be AI slop.
And I want the stupid piggy to shut his fucking slophole.
But we can’t get everything we want in life
And most of them with Ted Nugent, Roseanne, and Kevin Sorbo.
Larry’s the real CEO.
All movies have to be approved by the Saudi government. Definitely going slow down the the 30 movies annually
A delusional rich boy who doesn’t understand reality because he’s lived in an artificial bubble his whole life.
How many are propaganda?
It’s doable on a large scale. So long as you have enough people and money. Whether Paramount can do it… I doubt.
Even if it’s 30 children film an audience that consumes consumes consumes….. they would eventually cannibalize each other.
The 90s had more movies than today…. Because of indie films and import markets. And even then it was 25 million weekend was a successful weekend.
He can release as many as he wants- he still needs an audience.
I won’t be in it.
The old, tried and true, quantity over quality methods. Nothing beats inundating any market with slop.
Not if you have an Awesome-o robot!
Perhaps one day David will turn into a real boy.
Will those also be financed 49.5% by foreign companies?
Does that 49.5% buy them approval of what can be said and done in the movies?
By the way… worth pointing out that nothing has been stopping him from doing that with Paramount alone.
Kid Rock biopic, Ted Nugent biopic, what else