Atleast the Flex Seal guy making a watertight boat that floats with his product made sense to advertise his product and it actually worked when tested. This failed to work on a test that didnt make sense in the first place.
If it was a big major company do this id be rooting for these guys to dismantle their claim and false advertisements. But this was a tiny company started by a few people just wanting to sell socks, so this experiment feels like a dick move π
Think I'd rather have my socks rip off if for some reason I was getting pulled from them by a vehicle. Be a lot better than getting dragged to my death.
The first guy his feet stays straight,, so the socks did not fail. And when the second guy tried it his feet is a little cramp so the socks full out. The difference is known.
First uses his heel to actually hook the socks, the other guy has it ready to slip off his heel, like they wanted to just instantly disprove it rather than actually test it.
At 0:04s you clearly see that his shoulders doesn't touch the ground, that mean he's lying on a platform who has wheel, hidden bellow him, that's why he's not loosing his socks, since most of what the truck tracks, isn't brake by the ground, grace to the wheels. Even his head is too high per rapport to the ground… at 0:07 his legs shouldn't be able to get 'lower' than his knees, if he was laying on the ground entirely, but that's possible, if he's laying on a platform with small wheels, who raise his torso and upper-legs above the ground, even if slightly. and the socks were probably attached to the 1st guy's pant.
The feet angle was wrong. In the original video, the socks were being pulled straight along the foot, so the force was being pulled from the heel. In the recreation, the sock was pulled forward, slipping off the toes and then the heel. All your test proved was that the elastic opening was indeed weaker than the truck.
The comercial clearly shows the CEO keeping his foot straight and at an elevated position, this guy was keeping them flat against the ground with his feet angled towards the vehicle
37 Comments
Atleast the Flex Seal guy making a watertight boat that floats with his product made sense to advertise his product and it actually worked when tested. This failed to work on a test that didnt make sense in the first place.
Well there not glass slippers they're not rubber laced with adhesive but when he held on to them socks it was partially accurate
Try it and angle your feet the right way, « professional engineer » must have been the wrong type
If the ad was true then imagine putting on the sock
edits pmo
socks once on they never come off! buy now only 99.99
What a fucking waste of time for everyone involved ! π
"But when he held the socks, it actually worked"
Wow I wouldn't have known that that would've happened if you didn't say so. Wow.
If it was a big major company do this id be rooting for these guys to dismantle their claim and false advertisements. But this was a tiny company started by a few people just wanting to sell socks, so this experiment feels like a dick move π
Think I'd rather have my socks rip off if for some reason I was getting pulled from them by a vehicle. Be a lot better than getting dragged to my death.
All right let's hit the highwayππ
wait americans believe commercails are real?
What did u expect wena
Invincible office
the way they put their feet is defferent look close
Fake;(
Funny how dude has his feet scrunched up so the sock came off faster π
The first guy his feet stays straight,, so the socks did not fail. And when the second guy tried it his feet is a little cramp so the socks full out. The difference is known.
What if he actually flexed his upwards toes
I guess we were supoae to ignore your intentionally curling your toes to make sure the sock come off…
Driving with my darling ahh
Itβs cuz the CEO has his foot in a hook position while the testing guys curved their foots so it slipped off
Taking socks off DRAMATIC MUSIC
his feet is not straight enough like the ceo, his toes is pointing forward so its easy to pull off. Its about the position. Redo your test.
First uses his heel to actually hook the socks, the other guy has it ready to slip off his heel, like they wanted to just instantly disprove it rather than actually test it.
At 0:04s you clearly see that his shoulders doesn't touch the ground, that mean he's lying on a platform who has wheel, hidden bellow him, that's why he's not loosing his socks, since most of what the truck tracks, isn't brake by the ground, grace to the wheels.
Even his head is too high per rapport to the ground…
at 0:07 his legs shouldn't be able to get 'lower' than his knees, if he was laying on the ground entirely, but that's possible, if he's laying on a platform with small wheels, who raise his torso and upper-legs above the ground, even if slightly.
and the socks were probably attached to the 1st guy's pant.
To be fair the guy is trying to let the sock slip off
The feet angle was wrong. In the original video, the socks were being pulled straight along the foot, so the force was being pulled from the heel. In the recreation, the sock was pulled forward, slipping off the toes and then the heel. All your test proved was that the elastic opening was indeed weaker than the truck.
Socks dont fit and angles
wild
The comercial clearly shows the CEO keeping his foot straight and at an elevated position, this guy was keeping them flat against the ground with his feet angled towards the vehicle
If they used a regular driver instead of a monster truck driver i bet they wouldve stayed on
Type of stuff I do to NPCs in RDR2
Spoiler: it didnβt work
Just to crash another manβs hustle
Ngl, when wearing socks, I want to take them off sometimes.
ππππππππ