Justin Baldoni Claps Back At Blake Lively! Accuses HER Of Threats, Harassment AND:

Justin Baldoni Claps Back At Blake Lively! Accuses HER Of Threats, Harassment AND:

Excuse me for a moment. I am patting myself on the back cuz I am good. Perez Adamus called it again. Hello my frame. It is Perez, the queen of all media, the original influencer and your number one source for everything it ends with us. Saga. Team Baldoni has wasted no time already responding to the motion for sanctions filed by Amber 2.0 earlier today. Sexual harassment Barbie went crying to Judge Lyman today, arguing that Melissa Nathan, Jen Abel, Jamie Heath, all of the Belon parties filed false complaints against her. No validity to them. They were not tied to it whatsoever. There should have been no group filing, etc., etc. Watch my video on that from earlier today to get fully caught up. Additionally, the yummy and sexy and flirty Shantus said that the Baldon parties are clogging up the docket, purposefully delaying things and causing her to spend more money unnecessarily. What did I say? What did I tell you all when I made my video about this? I said projection mirror. You are doing all of these things. And that’s exactly what team Baldon is now arguing. It’s also interesting to note this letter to the judge was filed today but dated May 13th. Meaning they another simple extortion star is playing checkers, but Brian Freriedman, his attorney, is playing chess. How do the Baldon parties respond to the motion for sanctions, including they want the Baldon parties to pay for all of the attorney fees incurred recently. Team Baldoni says the following is the Wayfairer plaintiff’s consolidated response to the 12 rule 11 letters collectively the letters directed to each of the wayfairer plaintiffs by your clients Blake Lively and Ryan Reynolds the letters address alleged pleading defects that the Lively defendants have already placed before the court in their respected motions to dismiss the first amended complaint. That’s what I said. I’m so freaking good. I literally said that. Literally. The gist of the letters is that the first amended complaints extortion, defamation, and intentional and negligent interference claims are stated on behalf of the wayfairer parties as a group and do not state facts sufficient to state a claim on behalf of particular plaintiffs swept into the definition of wayfairer parties. For instance, the Lively defendants threatened sanctions against Jaime Heath on the asserted grounds, his producing partner, that Mr. Heath lacks standing to assert an intentional interference claim because the first amended complaint does not allege that he is a party to the allegedly interfered with WME contract. The agency that he was dropped from and the agency that his company Wayfairer Studios was dropped from. The same company that Jamie Heath is the head of. I see a direct correlation there. The Baldoni party’s letter says, “The first amended complaint, according to team Dulu, fails to plead specific defamatory statements about Mr. Heath, but does so only about others included in the term wayfairer parties.” As another example, the Lively defendants complain that Melissa Nathan, his crisis PR expert, is grouped under the umbrella of wayfairer parties in the first amended complaints extortion claim, even though only Wayfairer, Heath, and Baldoni are proper plaintiffs. The lively defendants also object that the first amended complaint’s false light claim is properly stated only by Baldoni, Heath, Abel, and Sorowitz and not Melissa Nathan. Simply put, listen up. Group pleading is the defect at the heart of the lively defendants rule 11 letters. I went over rule 11 in that video. Watch that to be fully caught up. As I said, such purported pleading facts, says the team Baldon letter, particularly those already before the court in a motion to dismiss as they have already submitted a motion to dismiss are not the proper subject of a rule 11 motion. Let me repeat that. Such purported pleading defects, the faults they claim in the first amended complaint, particularly those already before the court in a motion to dismiss, are not the proper subject of a rule 11 motion. In fact, such motions are improper if they are substantially identical to the arguments made by defendants in support of their motion to dismiss for failure to state a claim. I literally told you all they were the same regurgitated claims as her motion to dismiss. Then they cite case law. supporting what they say. Rule 11 blah blah blah blah blah should not be used for this. It should the lively defendants rule 11 arguments are not merely substantially similar to but the same as arguments asserted in their motions to dismiss. And a reminder her husband has also filed a motion to be dismissed too. The Baldoni party’s letter continues, “Even ignoring the awkward fact that rule 11 does not apply, group pleading is a common practice, as expressly stated in the responses to the lively defendants’s motion to dismiss. If the court deems this definitional issue to be a pleading defect, it is easily curable by amendment. A curable pleading defect does not rise to the level of frivolous, legally unreasonable, or factually without foundation as required for rule 11 sanctions. Put another way, if the court grants your client’s motions to dismiss in whole or part, the wayfairer plaintiffs will amend the first amended complaint as directed by the court, obviating any imagined rule 11 issue. If the court blesses the pleading and denies your motions to dismiss any rule 11 motion by your clients would be rendered frivolous. Indeed, the Supreme Court has recognized the flexibility provided by rule 11, allowing pleadings based on evidence reasonably anticipated after further investigation or discovery. Then they cite and elaborate upon the Supreme Court ruling blah blah blah blah blah. Finally, oh, this is so good. The letters cynically quote Mr. Freriedman, his lawyer, whose statements are not pleadings filed with the court and are thus outside the ambit of rule 11. Since they have no relevance to rule 11 sanctions, the only conclusion to be drawn is that the inclusion of the statements in the letters has no purpose but to harass and undermine Mr. Freriedman and our firm with the court. the very conduct sanctions seek to curtail in some. This is so good. The lively defendants 12 letters claiming that the wayfairer parties have violated rule 11 are in themselves frivolous and contrived solely to harass and increase the cost of litigation. I know you are, but what am I? Such hard ball litigation tactics, including threats of rule 11 sanctions, are improper. See, Gardo versus Ethel Corp. Okay, I got to the end and I realized I had a brain fart at the beginning. So, to take it a step back, this was an email sent to the floral fanatics lawyer last week. The Baldoni parties saw the motion for sanctions today coming a while ago. This is their response, but not their official response submitted to the court. This is what they told them last week. So, when we get their official response, it’ll probably be echoing everything that I shared with you in this video. Understood? We’re all learning a lot about the law together. All right, thoughts? Let’s discuss in the comments section.

👨‍⚖️ #BlakeLively #JustinBaldoni #RyanReynolds

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join

Listen to The Perez Hilton Podcast with Chris Booker HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com

Sign up for my Patreon and get lots of exclusive content at http://Patreon.com/PerezHilton

Follow Me!
MAIN CHANNEL: http://youtube.com/PerezHilton
WEBSITE: http://PerezHilton.com
PEREZ’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/PerezHilton
GET A PERSONALIZED VIDEO FROM ME HERE: https://www.cameo.com/perezhilton
LISTEN TO MY PODCAST HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
WEBSITE’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/ThePerezHilton

Check out my merch: http://BuyPopStuff.com

About Perez Hilton:
The original influencer, Perez Hilton founded and oversees one of the most iconic websites ever. In addition to his eponymous blog, he is the host of a very successful podcast, has a loyal following across two YouTube channels, has written four books, has acted in countless TV shows and films – as well as the stage. And, most importantly, he is the proud father of three happy and thriving kids and an adult child, his mother. Perez is one of the most sought after commentators and your best friend!

Justin Baldoni Claps Back At Blake Lively! Accuses HER Of Threats, Harassment AND:

Perez Hilton
https://www.youtube.com/perezhilton