Blake Lively Is Publicity Stunting And ATTACKING Us, Says Team Justin Baldoni! Today They:

Blake Lively Is Publicity Stunting And ATTACKING Us, Says Team Justin Baldoni! Today They:

After all the disgustingness of everything diddy, I am so thankful to dive back into this mess. Hello my frame. It is Perez, the queen of all media, the original influencer, and your number one source for everything it ends with us saga. As I told you earlier this week, several women’s rights groups inserted themselves into this narrative. The Equal Rights Advocates, the California Employment Lawyers Association, and the California Women’s Law Center pleaded with Judge Lyman, who is overseeing the federal trial, which means no cameras in the courtroom. Sucks for you, but good for me. These groups are advocating on behalf of Blake Lively and the newly passed law in California that bans retaliatory lawsuits against women or men who speak up about sexual harassment. At the heart of their argument, Ku Klux Khesi is a victim of that predator. Team Plantation Princess is trying to get all me too in this lawsuit because they worked in collaboration with these women’s rights groups. And as I told you all when I first covered this, even if you take out the defamation, Justin Baldoni still has a lot of claims, other valid claims against the Sisterhood of the Traveling Plantation alum. But the lawyer for Baldoni and the Wayfairer parties, Brian Freriedman, who is also my lawyer, has not given me a discount or any information or swayed me in any way. Brian Freriedman today just filed a letter with the judge. He and they are firmly in opposition of this amicus brief by these groups and brought up some quite excellent points to the judge. So let’s go over this. Freriedman argues that this amicus brief by organizations not a part of the lawsuit is biased. Biased against his client. The court should not even entertain this. Freriedman argues because it is just a vehicle to renew Blake Lively’s public attacks against the Wayf Farer parties, repeat arguments previously made by Lively, and raise issues that are irrelevant to the pending motion to dismiss. A reminder, Blake Lizley and her husband and her publicist Leslie Sloan have all filed to be dismissed from this lawsuit. The lawsuit that happened because they were the first to file suit against him and the Wayfairer parties. they wouldn’t be here if they didn’t file the lawsuit that they now want to be removed from and that he just defended himself and the judge consolidated the both lawsuits. So these organizations were not just giving context about defamation lawsuits meant to silence victims of sexual harassment. The orgs were also trying to bolster her claim to be dismissed from the lawsuit. And Freriedman says while the wayfairer parties respect the three organizations seeking Amichi status, their brief fails to add the court in its task at the pleading stage. If for any reason the court grants the organizations’s leave to file a brief, the wayfairer parties should be permitted to file a responsive brief. A lot of legal ease. However, a very very compelling point perhaps the best. It is brought to the judge’s attention or reminder. As an initial matter, the organizations filed their belated motion with Lively’s consent almost two months after Lively’s motion to dismiss had been fully briefed, enabling Lively to resume unwarranted attacks on the way farfer parties with inflammatory comments to the press. Translation: Why didn’t you file this a month and a half ago? The motion serves more as a publicity stunt for Lively than a useful aid for the court at the pleading stage. Regardless, the motion should be denied because neither it nor the proposed brief satisfies the limited conditions under which a district court may consider an amicus brief. Then the letter cites the law and cases and it continues, “The organizations do not assert that Lively’s council is incompetent, nor do they identify any other case that may be affected by this court’s decision on Lively’s motion to dismiss. Rather, the organizations rely on their unique perspective as drafters and champions of California Assembly Bill 933, which is another way of saying that the organization’s attempt to provide disguised, premature, and inappropriate expert testimony at the pleading stage. Boom. That’s literally what they’ve told the judge. and he’s saying now is not the time for that. And Freriedman cites law and cases why now is not the time for that. and continues saying, “While the Wayfairer parties respect the work of the organizations, they are not neutral friends of the court, but rather advocates of specific policy interests that align not only with Lively’s defensive posture, but also her affirmative claims against the wayfairer parties. In addition, the proposed brief raises issues that were not presented by Lively. The proposed brief focuses on the need to avoid abuses of discovery in sexual harassment cases, which is an issue that was not raised by Lively, who did not move for a stay of discovery and in any event is not applicable to this dispute given Lively’s pending affirmative claims. Discovery is well underway and these arguments are inapposite. Wow, I’ve never seen that word before. In opposite. In opposite means out of place or inappropriate. Whoever drafted that word, they deserve a bonus. Fancy. Finally, the proposed brief by these organizations violates the timing guidelines used by district courts for such briefs. Then they cite law and cases as the Wayfairer parties would need time to respond to the proposed brief. A decision on Lively’s motion to dismiss would be further delayed by its inclusion weighing against granting leave. Once again, all very sensible. And the law says since parties should have their dispute resolved without any unnecessary delay where the filing of an amicus brief would cause such a delay, it should not be accepted. Boom. So with all of those reasons, the court should not give them leave to go and file this amicus brief. And let’s go on with the show, says Brian Freriedman. And what a show it is. Thank you to him and her and him and him and her and you. This was good. This is needed. This is like a a a sorbet after everything diddy. You know, we need we need we needed this palette cleanse. All right, thoughts. Let’s discuss about everything in the comment section.

🫖 #BlakeLively #JustinBaldoni #TaylorSwift

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join

Listen to The Perez Hilton Podcast with Chris Booker HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com

Sign up for my Patreon and get lots of exclusive content at http://Patreon.com/PerezHilton

Follow Me!
MAIN CHANNEL: http://youtube.com/PerezHilton
WEBSITE: http://PerezHilton.com
PEREZ’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/PerezHilton
GET A PERSONALIZED VIDEO FROM ME HERE: https://www.cameo.com/perezhilton
LISTEN TO MY PODCAST HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
WEBSITE’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/ThePerezHilton

Check out my merch: http://BuyPopStuff.com

About Perez Hilton:
The original influencer, Perez Hilton founded and oversees one of the most iconic websites ever. In addition to his eponymous blog, he is the host of a very successful podcast, has a loyal following across two YouTube channels, has written four books, has acted in countless TV shows and films – as well as the stage. And, most importantly, he is the proud father of three happy and thriving kids and an adult child, his mother. Perez is one of the most sought after commentators and your best friend!

Blake Lively Is Publicity Stunting And ATTACKING Us, Says Team Justin Baldoni! Today They:

Perez Hilton
https://www.youtube.com/perezhilton