Blake Lively Admits To Her Sham! And Accusations That Ryan Reynolds’ Wife Is Also A Thief! She:
rest what rest no weekends off hello my friend it is Perez the queen of all media the original influencer and your number one source for everything it ends with us Saga near okay i don’t know i don’t know i just I felt it as many of you know last year one of Time magazine’s most influential people Blake Lively filed a pretend lawsuit to get information that she used in her real lawsuit against Justin Baldon and the Wayfairer parties the Vanzan Sham lawsuit subpoena gate remember after Baldon’s publicist was fired from Jones Works his old PR company because Stephanie Jones the boss found out that Jen Ael was going to start her own company she got rid of her and took Jen Abel’s phone and laptop and according to the Wayfairer parties improperly seized all of her communications including nonrelevant personal health related info and more that very same day according to Baldon and Wayfairer the publicist for the A-lister in her own mind got word of what Jen Ael was saying how Stephanie Jones allegedly Stephanie Jones is very ligious it is also rumored that Stephanie Jones then happily handed over Pinocchio everything but she needed a legal excuse to have them so the Vanzan Sham do lawsuit where she filed it anonymously and nobody was notified except for Jones works baldoni Abel and parties did not have a chance to respond even though Vanzan her company was alleging breach of contract how could Jen Abel have a contract with a company she never did business with or Justin Baldoni made no sense but allegedly it’s legal i don’t know hella sketch and that leads us to where we are now as I mentioned earlier this week Jen Ael Baldon’s still publicist has been fighting with her company to produce the original subpoena as well as more relevant information that Vanzan is in possession of lame Lively has been trying to fight that subpoena and I’ve covered that this week but today no weekends off for team Baldon Wayfairer in this separate litigation the lawyer for the Baldon parties the lawyer representing Jen Ael just moments ago filed a letter with the court dated today it says “Dear Judge Lyman defendant and counter claimant Jennifer Ael respectfully seeks leave to file a reply in response to non-party Van Xan Inc.” and nonparty Blake Lively’s responses to a document subpoena served by Jennifer Ael on April 21st in her answer and counter claim Abel contends that Stephanie Jones and her company Jones Works collaborated with non-party Lively and her council to fabricate a sham lawsuit the Vanzan Action for the sole purpose of obtaining documents that Jones pirated from Abel’s phone and iCloud accounts without waiting for discovery in anticipated litigation against Justin Baldon and Wayfairer Studio videos and without notice to able or the wayfairer parties as I quite so wonderfully laid it all out for you at the beginning of this video Lively admits that the Van Xan action was a sham contrived for the sole purpose of obtaining Abel’s text messages as part of an investigation preceding Lively’s filing of her claims against the Wayfairer parties abel has subpoenaed Vanzan for information relating to Vanzan’s ownership whether it is owned or controlled by Lively or her husband Ryan Reynolds a copy of the subpoena Vanzan served on Jones the Vanzan subpoena and the documents that Jones purportedly produced in response to the Vanzan subpoena vanzan objected on the grounds that the information was irrelevant and that as a nonparty Vanzan should not be required to produce documents that were available from parties to this litigation in its response to Abel’s motion to compel Vanzan agreed to produce documents responsive to request numbers 1 1410 and 11 as modified implicitly conceding that Vanzan’s ownership the sham Vanzan complaint the Vanzan subpoena and the documents Jones produced in response to the Vanzan subpoena are relevant and discoverable ellen Garop must have been a little tired because there’s a couple little typos in this uh filing today in other words Vanzan has withdrawn its objections to requests seeking documents concerning the Vanzan subpoena which facilitated Jones’s transfer of Abel’s documents to Lively in light of this agreement this letter focuses on the single remaining disputed item request number nine and why this court should compel Vanzan to produce Vanzan’s communications including communications between and among Jones Lively and Vanzan or between their council relating to the sham Vanzan action and subpoena this reply also addresses the objections that Lively a nonparty to the Jones action has gratuitously asserted in her letter seeking to intervene or the court’s permission to file a response vanzan continues to assert and now lively asserts the same hollow objections to request number nine which Vanzan originally asserted to all Abel’s requests namely that communications relating to the Vanzan subpoena are irrelevant and not discoverable from non-party Vanzan because they are available from Jones vanzan does not explain why it continues to object on grounds it effectively waved for all other doc Oh great point for all other documents relating to the Vanzan subpoena surrender the Jones communications vanzan argues that Abel has already received the only relevant documents from Lively the documents received from Lively included a purported copy of the Vanzan subpoena and documents Lively maintains she received from Vanzan allegedly in response to the Vanzan subpoena vanzan does not and cannot allege that Lively produced the communications sought by request number nine she has not in any event a nonparties protection against purportedly burdensome discovery requests is less robust whereas here it is closely allied with a party fact here in related action Lively has herself produced the documents Vanzan obtained from Jones pursuant to Vanzan’s state court subpoena in other words Lively is Van Xan and there can be no legitimate contention that it is unduly burdensome for Van Xan i.e lively to produce the communications responsive to request number nine oh I’m loving Ellen Garop nor can Vanzan argue with a straight face that the communications relating to the coordination between Jones Lively and Vanzan relating to the Van Xan action and subpoena are irrelevant particularly in light of Vanzan’s implicit admission that all other documents relating to the subpoena are relevant and discoverable in fact communications concerning the Vanzan action and subpoena go to the crux of Abel’s claim that Jones and Lively conspired to obtain Abel’s stolen information and use the Sham Van Xan lawsuit to provide a veneer of legitimacy for Jones’s transfer of stolen information to Lively such communications will also show whether as Abel suspects Jones provided data taken from Abel’s stolen phone to Lively before service of the Vanzan subpoena and Vanzan subpoena was a ruse contrived by Jones and Lively to cover up what they knew was a wrongful disclosure of Abel’s communications further even assuming that Lively Produced or has possession of the communication sought by request number nine there is no rule that the party sources must be exhausted before calling upon third parties to produce relevant discovery for the foregoing reasons and those set forth in Abel’s motion Abel respectfully requests that the court entering Vanzan to produce all documents responsive to request number nine in the subpoena directed to Vanzan i am Ellen Garop’s newest fan that is who is representing Abel here in today’s motion granted if I was the judge what do you think of this all what should happen let’s discuss everything in the comments
🫖 #BlakeLively #JustinBaldoni #TaylorSwift
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join
Listen to The Perez Hilton Podcast with Chris Booker HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
Sign up for my Patreon and get lots of exclusive content at http://Patreon.com/PerezHilton
Follow Me!
MAIN CHANNEL: http://youtube.com/PerezHilton
WEBSITE: http://PerezHilton.com
PEREZ’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/PerezHilton
GET A PERSONALIZED VIDEO FROM ME HERE: https://www.cameo.com/perezhilton
LISTEN TO MY PODCAST HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
WEBSITE’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/ThePerezHilton
Check out my merch: http://BuyPopStuff.com
About Perez Hilton:
The original influencer, Perez Hilton founded and oversees one of the most iconic websites ever. In addition to his eponymous blog, he is the host of a very successful podcast, has a loyal following across two YouTube channels, has written four books, has acted in countless TV shows and films – as well as the stage. And, most importantly, he is the proud father of three happy and thriving kids and an adult child, his mother. Perez is one of the most sought after commentators and your best friend!
Blake Lively Admits To Her Sham! And Accusations That Ryan Reynolds’ Wife Is Also A Thief! Justin Baldoni’s Team:
Perez Hilton
https://www.youtube.com/perezhilton

26 Comments
Enjoy my channel? Become a member! Your support would be SO APPRECIATED! Plus, you'd get a badge that shows up every time you comment, access to my members-only lives every weekday at 7:15 PM EST and more! Subscribe to get access to all the perks HERE: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join
Vanzan Jean Claude Van Dam Sham Van Van Zan Sham 😂 should be investigated and audited. My God, this Ryan Reynolds and Flakes Lively are NAUSETING 🤮🤮🤮🤮 they’re a match made in HELL.
Shake down Lively acting illegally. What a surprise.
As Elsrich was saying the Vanzan Sham is the basis of all the lawsuits and scandals relating to the whole saga so it’s important to get to the crux of the issues.
I'm waiting for snake & lyin to start tearing each other apart.
I bet 50p that blake will throw him under bus first 😂
Can't wait
Ok, drinking game.
Take a shot every time you hear "VanZan".
It’s about time!!!
Friedman gett'em for the taxes-alla "Al Capone"
Imagine the legal fees / weekend penalty rates 😳😅 Thanks for keeping us in the loop in "your weekend time" Perez 🫶😁
everyone involved in this case is despicable. starting with Blake and Ryan but also these unethical publicists… they're a piece of work 🤮
this Stephanie Jones woman seamed to have additionally screw over everyone and is absolutely gross
Yes, with the chest pound on 'Sagaaaa' ✊ ✊ ✊
I think no matter how much they want to postulate and peacock around, with Time magazine and affiliates. Their acting careers are finito. Things will never, ever be the same again.
I never wanna hear the word Vanzan after this is all said and done! Holy hell that was a lot of vanzans and shams lol
HellSketch 😂
Ok, Ok, You finally got my sub ! Reading that was a tour de force !
Pretty sure a guy named Van Wilder runs Vanzan.
The more they hide… The worst they look
This retaliation case is so weak…She is relying on text messages and untraceable boots as evidence😢😮Eish
People online wonder how the Judge dismissed Baldoni's defamation lawsuit in NYC where it is almost impossible to prove defamation against public figures. Yet, some online call the Judge corrupt, and accuse Blake of having a crush on Baldoni and was rejected and accuse the Judge, Blake and Ryan of things that have nothing to do with the lawsuits. According to those people, Baldoni's defamation lawsuit in NYC should have not been dismissed. Yet, don't they know the Judge legally can't sue them for calling him corrupt and Ryan and Blake can't sue them for what they accuse without proof for defamation. Funny, how they don't know the laws concerning defamation in court. Many people use their company to sue for texts etc from another party. Especially when they didn't sue publicly the parties. They used it for asking another court to look into it. Blaming the newspaper has nothing to do with Ryan and Blake. And I am pro Blake for accusing Baldoni of SH. But that doesn't mean the court should not follow NY's law. Don't compare this to Depp and Heard. Depp was the one to file first in VA for a reason. They at that time accepted defamation cases against public figures. Depp did not file in any other state but VA for a good reason. Blake filed in NYC and all Justin could legally do was counter sue in NYC. Depp's and Heard's case was different than Blake's. Plus Heard had accused Depp of violently attacking her during their marriage etc. Depp had the proof. And the case was picked to be in VA by his attorneys. Also, usually in companies, if someone like Abel leaves the company, they have a two year legal agreement to not take clients and not work for another company in the same field. We don't know if that is the case yet. But we do know Abel was leaving and taking Wayfarer with her. If she had a provision in her contract that she can't take clients and can't work in the same field for two years, she is in trouble legally. Perhaps there was no such clause in her contract.
Really enjoyed this one! 🎥 You present the celeb news in such an engaging way… can’t wait to see more! 🙌✨
I am surprised this has not been asked yet, but how much do you think Lively's team is contributing to the judges' retirement fund?
😂 J'ai aimé vos p'tites notes 🎶 d'une certaine chanson de Céline… ! Vous étiez bien parti, il ne fallait pas vous arrêter ! 😉
Team Blake and Ryan❤ we all reap what we sow everybody better quit this bullying😢
A judge sued for money. Great!🎉
Blake and Ryan are criminal masterminds, aided and abetted by Leslie Sloane
If judge doesn’t grant this he is not well in the head
Vanzan’s attorney switch was an intentional legal firewall to protect Blake Lively and Manatt from accountability for a SHAM lawsuit and data abuse.