Justin Baldoni SCHOOLS Blake Lively’s Publicist! Taunts Her To File A New Lawsuit!
I told y’all it would be a busy week. I had no idea it would be this busy so quickly. Hello my frame. It is Perez, the queen of all media, the original influencer and your number one source for everything. It ends with us saga. As we painfully know, last month, Judge Lyman tossed into the garbage Justin Baldon’s lawsuit against Word Saladista Blake Lively. He did give Baldoni and the Wayfairer parties the chance to amend their complaint for the second time, but they chose not to do that. Instead, they released a vague statement announcing that they were going to pursue other legal options. As a result of the judge’s ruling, that meant that the Boonh Hall baby’s husband, Ryan Reynolds, and her publicist, Leslie Sloans, were no longer parties to the litigation cuz she’s clearly not suing them. He was suing them, but his lawsuit is not moving forward at the time being. Appeal is still an option for them. And almost immediately after his lawsuit was tossed and she was dropped from litigation, Lively’s publicist Leslie Sloan filed a motion to recover attorneys fees from Baldon and the Wayfairer parties. Remember, she is seeking about $1.3 million, a pretty penny. Well, literally just minutes ago, Baldoni and his cohorts filed an opposition to that request. And it almost makes too much sense citing not just law but also procedural mistakes that Leslie Sloan made. And this made so much sense that I fear Judge Lyman is not going to grant their denial and he will move forward with awarding Leslie Sloan attorney’s fees. But hear them out because even a non-legal scholar, even an average person should agree this is the way to go. Why? Well, Sloan invoked New York’s anti-SLAP statute, the New York Civil Rights Law 7A, and the court’s inherent power to award attorney’s fees allegedly expended to defend now dismissed defamation claims. This I would stop reading right after it. A claim for attorney’s fees and costs pursuant to 70A must be brought not by way of emotion, but as an action, claim, crossclaim, or counter claim for damages under 7A New York civil rights law. The New York anti-slap statute requires that a pleading of some sort be filed in order to collect attorney’s fees. Even a cross motion for fees would appear to be inadequate under section 70A. Sloan’s motion ignores the statutory pleading requirement necessary to recover fees under 7A and assumes that a motion is insufficient vehicle to seek costs and fees under 7A. Sloan overlooks the key reason why this relief must be requested through a pleading. A separate pleading is required because a party seeking relief under 70A must assert factual allegations from which the court can plausibly infer that the plaintiff has violated New York’s anti-slap law by bringing a defamation claim that lacks a substantial basis in fact and law. in some making it simple for all of us because the amended complaint his was dismissed before Sloan her publicist asserted any affirmative claim per the terms of the New York law. Sloan must file a separate lawsuit in order to recover any attorney’s fees. Sloan has not done so, but seeking relief by way of motion after dismissal. For this reason alone, Sloan’s motion should be denied. But if it’s as simple as this, we know Sloan will be filing a lawsuit to collect attorneys fees. Is that smart, though? Remember, there’s more information that we know now after the judge made his ruling. For example, that reporter for the Daily Mail saying that he was coerced into making that declaration. The judge did not take that into consideration. Additionally, state anti-slab laws do not apply in federal court. The Baldoni Wayfairer parties argue in deciding Sloan’s motion to dismiss. The court applied California law. The court however invited the parties to address choice of law issues. Although she chose New York as the forum for her lawsuit, Lively fired the first Salvo by filing, I love that word, salvo, by filing a complaint with California’s Civil Rights Department, which purported to assert her claims for violation of California’s Fair Employment and Housing Act and Labor Code. Facts. Lively continues to insist that California law applies to her employment related sexual harassment claims against Baldoni and the other wayfairer parties. This very lengthy response then goes into even more reasons why California law should apply here. And then summing things up, in short, the laws of California should govern the evaluation of the Wayfairer party’s claims for harm suffered in California by the wayf farer parties who all live, work, and or do business in California as the result of conduct aimed at California. The second circuit holds that California’s anti-slap statute does not apply in federal court where this litigation is happening and thus Sloan’s fee motion should be denied. However, even assuming New York law applies, Sloan’s fee request fails. They argue New York’s anti-slap statute section 7A conflicts with multiple federal rules of civil procedure and then they go into the minutia of that all and they remind the judge as a general matter in the United States the prevailing litigant is ordinarily not entitled to collect a reasonable attorney’s fee from the loser. Um, I know this firsthand painfully. [Laughter] I am very familiar with the legal system. Courts use their inherent powers sparingly and only in the most egregious circumstances. In the second court, before a district can impose sanctions using its inherent powers, it must make two findings. that the challenged claim was without a collarable collarable that the claim was made without I’m going to look up collaboral and give you a different word without a justified basis and two that the claim was brought in bad faith meaning their side. Neither element is met here. Correct. They had very good reasons and still have very good reasons to move forward with appeal. I would say they also explain that the court did not dismiss the defamation claims because they were not solid. They were just out lawyered. The court dismissed them because the Wayfairer parties failed to adequately plead Sloan’s involvement in Lively’s provisions of the draft CRD complaint to the New York Times or that Sloan individually in making statements to a Daily Mail reporter that Baldon sexually assaulted Lively did any more than repeat Lively’s version of events, which she had no reason to doubt. The Wayfairer parties filed suit in the aftermath of a coordinated hit orchestrated by Sloan in concert with Lively Reynolds and the New York Times. And they committed no egregious actions filing their lawsuit. So motion for fees should be denied. They say I agree. How about you?
😳 #BlakeLively #JustinBaldoni #TaylorSwift
Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join
Listen to The Perez Hilton Podcast with Chris Booker HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
Sign up for my Patreon and get lots of exclusive content at http://Patreon.com/PerezHilton
Follow Me!
MAIN CHANNEL: http://youtube.com/PerezHilton
WEBSITE: http://PerezHilton.com
PEREZ’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/PerezHilton
GET A PERSONALIZED VIDEO FROM ME HERE: https://www.cameo.com/perezhilton
LISTEN TO MY PODCAST HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
WEBSITE’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/ThePerezHilton
Check out my merch: http://BuyPopStuff.com
About Perez Hilton:
The original influencer, Perez Hilton founded and oversees one of the most iconic websites ever. In addition to his eponymous blog, he is the host of a very successful podcast, has a loyal following across two YouTube channels, has written four books, has acted in countless TV shows and films – as well as the stage. And, most importantly, he is the proud father of three happy and thriving kids and an adult child, his mother. Perez is one of the most sought after commentators and your best friend!
Justin Baldoni SCHOOLS Blake Lively’s Publicist! Taunts Her To File A New Lawsuit!
Perez Hilton
https://www.youtube.com/perezhilton

33 Comments
Eww not more content on the LOVE BOMBER. He's so ick and I can't wait for his cheating claims to come out. I feel sorry for his wife but it is what it is xx
Subpoena Serena is so exhausting.
My opinion is that BL and RR's plan is to exhaust everyone out and maybe hoping for a new scandal to break out so that everyone forgets about this whole thing but it isn't guna work and their antics are just pissing people off along with being exhausting 🙄
After 8 months of watching these two oxygen thieves I’m convinced this is all shits and giggles to them. They know her career is stuffed and also I feel their interests are in production. They are keen to see Wayfarer spend the $100m. They are planning a “ My truth- the Blake lively story”, starring themselves of course. No matter what peeps say it would be a block buster and they recover all their costs easily, openly make all the digs they wish. It’s a just a game to these monsters.
Lieman should use this moment to redeem himself for his hasty dismissal.
Wrong picture of Baldoni
word saladista 🤣😆🤣
Boone Hall baby😂😂
Word salidista? Bahahaha!!
Is it a coincidence that today Forbes had a section stating “Scarlett Johansson Is The Highest-Grossing Actor Ever After Leading ‘Jurassic World: Rebirth’ and Blake is in rant PR mode?
She must hate that Scarlet is positively on the spotlight.
Serious question- Does Leslie Sloan and Stephanie Jones still have clients that employ them? If so, I'd really like to know who they are so I can make sure never to support any of their clients again. We the public hold more power than we realize. We vote and show support with our dollars.
The billboard queen is the first influencer tho… maybe you have first social media influencer but you ain’t the first!
She's so exhausting
Boone Hall baby again 🎉 love it 😂
Wow, I bet Sloan does file a motion, after being schooled by BF.
I've never seen such blatant disregard for the facts. Everyone involved on Blake side leaves a trail of unlawful behavior. We see it. Why won't Judge Lieman? The answer is devastatingly obvious 😢
“Word Saladista” 😂😂😂😂😂😂
I hope this changes the direction of discovery (away from the frivolous requests of Blake Lively- that in itself is a huge red flag)
Good job Perez! Keep up the good work!
Word Saladista😂😂😂
In Brazil we have a saying: If you don't know the rules, don't enter the game… Sloane proving once more she's not only vile, but also stup1d.
Candace and Andy getting subpoena is to shut you all up. Tactic to silence the truth. This is how they get ahead of bad press.
But wont serena just refile it correctly now? Annoying
I honestly don't like how reactive/passive Bryan Freedman and the Wayfarer team is being being about this. They're too Reactive, not Proactive at all. And it's 😢 freaking annoying to me
NOBODY beats Perez…..hilarious!
Blake must b sooo jealous of Scarlett….even her name stinks…..BLAKE……boring
Doesn't her lawyer know this??
Is it true that when vetuska told freedman about the sexual asault statement the CRD complaint has not been filed so the reporter couldn’t be basing his statement off of the complaint.
I'm sure they are goading Sloane to file another lawsuit so they can countersue!! Although, I think the real criminal is Stephanie Jones… she should be charged criminally for wiretapping, subpoena fraud and also breach of contract since she violated her confidentiality with her client, Wayfarer.
Omg the names you come up with are classic, “word saladista” I’m cracking up
If she files a new suit for damages, they can argue with the new evidence they have which proves their defamation claims.
Painfully Omg I dunno who people
Have that kinda back up money wtf lol
Well written response from the Baldoni side. I would expect the same response for Ryan.