Content Creators Fight Back! Go HARD Against Blake Lively, Her Lawyer – And The Judge Too!!!

Content Creators Fight Back! Go HARD Against Blake Lively, Her Lawyer – And The Judge Too!!!

Oh my god, she was not expecting this. Hello my friend. It is Perez, the queen of all media, the original influencer and your number one source for everything. It ends with us, Saga. As I’ve shared with you, fake snively has subpoenaed Google to try and get information and very sensitive details pertaining to the YT accounts of several smaller creators and some that have larger followings as well. But predominantly this list of over a dozen, most of the creators are micro influencers. Many like me see this as bullying and an intimidation tactic and an attempt to silence her critics. Well, just moments ago, two of these creators have responded to the word saladista in the most delectable fashion. First up, Lauren Nate, who is very legally informed but is not a lawyer, has clapped back. She told Judge Lyman today, “I am writing to formally notify the court of my intent to file a motion to quash the subpoena issued by plaintiff Blake Lively to Google LLC, served by Ezra Hudson of Manette, Phelps, and Phillips. I am a non-party independent content creator operating the YT channel Lethal Lauren 904. I have no affiliation with any parties involved in this case. My forthcoming motion to quash will be accompanied by a detailed supporting memorandum based on the following grounds. Violation of First Amendment rights. My commentary about matters of public concern is constitutionally protected. plaintiff has failed to demonstrate any valid evidentiary basis justifying the infringement of my right to keep my personal information anonymous. Two, stored communications act violation. Google lacks my consent to disclose my personal subscriber information and communications. Three, improper issuance under FRCP. Plaintiff’s subpoena was improperly issued from the Southern District of New York, exceeding rule 45’s geographic limits since compliance is requested from Google LLC, which is located in California. Unduly burdensome and over broad, the subpoena’s expansive request for personal identifiers, financial, geoloccation, and other sensitive data is irrelevant, disproportionate, and designed, as I told you, designed to harass and intimidate. And five, irreparable harm. Disclosure of my information threatens serious harm to my privacy, safety, and professional reputation. Given these abuses, I intend to seek appropriate sanctions, including reimbursement of my reasonable expenses. I will also request a protective order under rule 26C, barring plaintiff from further similar abusive discovery without prior court approval. I anticipate filing the formal motion to quash and accompanying materials within the timeline prescribed by the applicable rules as otherwise directed by this court. Then another content creator who unfortunately wanted to be anonymous but the court judge Lyman did not grant her her anonymity has also responded. She is a YT creator like Lauren and her name is Cassidy O’Connell. She sent a letter directly to the judge saying, “Based on the sound arguments in this letter, I strongly express my wish for my name to be redacted before being filed or supplied to the lively parties. But if the court will only publish or entertain my correspondence by unmasking me against my first amendment right, I have no other option at this time other than to put the lively parties and this court on notice that I reserve the right to take action for this treatment by them in the future. this mess and how she is handling it is going to haunt her for years to come. The damage that Dulu has self-inflicted cannot be understated. Cassidy Okonnell told Judge Lyman rightfully so, complaining, quote, “There are nonparty rules for submission in this court’s individual practice to refer to when filing with the court while the court is holding us non-parties to the standard of parties by quoting case law intended for parties in its order. We are not plaintiffs nor are we defendants in this case. We are nonparties that have received subpoenas sent to a third party that did not go through the appropriate process to be obtained. And had they, they would not have met the standard to have been approved. That’s why she went to Google and not the creators individually. Cassidy reminds the judge of the First Amendment protected right to anonymous speech, particularly online, and that unmasking anonymous speakers through discovery, can chill free expression. When someone is seeking to unmask an anonymous user online, they must prove two things. Plaintiffs must provide good cause and also the court must balance the strength of the case and the necessity of the disclosure against the speaker’s first amendment interest in maintaining anonymity. I was not afforded this standard. Subpoenas were issued from this court not only failing to meet this standard but failing to meet any standard. Cassidy tells Judge Lyman, “There is no evidence or sound legal basis whatsoever to have issued this subpoena in the first place. We would not be in this position if the court had not allowed such a weward subpoena in the first place. And yet the court demands our unmasking in a case that the entire world is watching. How dare this court?” The subpoena issued from this court for my information fails at every level. The law recognizes that in order to request this information, a subpoena is needed. Yet the court demands I readily supply it as if this subpoena has already been granted. It has not. It should not be and it should not have been issued. The error lies with this court, but demands I bear the burden for its mistake. Savage. And here is the surprise and my favorite part. An additional purpose of this letter is to inform the court that multiple nonparties who were served this illotten subpoena are filing a complaint today with the California State Bar against Ezra Hudson, the attorney who signed it without the appropriate requirements of presenting a primaachi showing before the court passing the two-prong standard of high fields required to unmask our first amendment protected rights to to publish anonymously on the internet and without domesticating it to the appropriate court in Sacramento, California, where Google is located. On what legal basis were the subpoenas issued out of this court? Was any evidence at all presented to validate them? Or is Miss Lively free to submit just any subpoena to anyone that is not her fan? Miss Lively has been gratuitously allowed to extend her witch hunt for discovery in which she has no evidence to support and has amended this same subpoena to add members of X on July 17th. I told you about that earlier. Accordingly, more complaints and motions to quash will follow. And the kicker, at this time, we are drafting a complaint against the court as well. They included a draft of the complaint they are filing with the California Bar against sexual harassment Barbie’s lawyer, Ezra Hudson. And some of the issues violations of California rules of professional conduct include meritous claims and contentions, truthfulness in statements to others, misconduct, conduct that violates legal rights, respect for rights of third parties, expediting litigation, harm and impact. This is Wow. Kudos to Cassidy and all of the other creators who have banded together to stand up to injustice. All right, my fram thoughts on everything. Let’s discuss in the comments section.

👏 👏 👏 👏 #BlakeLively #JustinBaldoni #TaylorSwift

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join

Listen to The Perez Hilton Podcast with Chris Booker HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com

Sign up for my Patreon and get lots of exclusive content at http://Patreon.com/PerezHilton

Follow Me!
MAIN CHANNEL: http://youtube.com/PerezHilton
WEBSITE: http://PerezHilton.com
PEREZ’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/PerezHilton
GET A PERSONALIZED VIDEO FROM ME HERE: https://www.cameo.com/perezhilton
LISTEN TO MY PODCAST HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
WEBSITE’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/ThePerezHilton

Check out my merch: http://BuyPopStuff.com

About Perez Hilton:
The original influencer, Perez Hilton founded and oversees one of the most iconic websites ever. In addition to his eponymous blog, he is the host of a very successful podcast, has a loyal following across two YouTube channels, has written four books, has acted in countless TV shows and films – as well as the stage. And, most importantly, he is the proud father of three happy and thriving kids and an adult child, his mother. Perez is one of the most sought after commentators and your best friend!

Content Creators Fight Back! Go HARD Against Blake Lively, Her Lawyer – And The Judge Too!!!

Perez Hilton
https://www.youtube.com/perezhilton