Justin Baldoni Sued AGAIN Because Of Blake Lively! In This Just-Filed Complaint:

Justin Baldoni Sued AGAIN Because Of Blake Lively! In This Just-Filed Complaint:

This is a threeinone video. A lot of updates for you. Hello my frame. It is Perez, the queen of all media, the original influencer, and your number one source for everything it Ends With Us saga. This is not a good way for Justin Baldon to start the week. The original director of It Ends With Us has just been sued again because of the salad spinner. A lawsuit was just filed today also in the Southern District of New York by Harkco National Insurance Company. They did business with his Wayfairer studios and claim that Baldoni and company lied to the insurers. So they filed this lawsuit to legally be off the hook and not have to pay for the copious Wayfairer legal bills. The insurance company is seeking a declaration that its insurance policies for Wayfairer are not enforcable. His company took out two separate year-long insurance policies for the film. one effective from July 15th, 2023 until July 15, 2024 and a second one effective from July 15, 2024 until July 15, 2025. Those of us who know know the numbers, math, the dates. As the insurance company notes in their lawsuit today, Lively and others complained of sexual harassment during pre-production and production of the film as early as May of 2023 before they entered into the agreement with the insurance company. The complaint says, “Despite the acknowledged pre- July 2023 complaints by Lively and others, Wayfairer’s July 2023 application for the 2023 policy includes a letter from Wayfairer, which warrants that no person or entity for whom the insurance is intended has any knowledge or information of any act, error, omission, fact, or circumstance which may give rise to a claim which may fall within the employment practices liability coverage if issued by Harkco. They were aware of a big B blake major problem. The 2023 warranty also states that quote, “It is agreed that if such knowledge or information exists, any claim arising there from whether or not disclosed herein, is excluded from the proposed coverage.” And Harko says that when Wayfairer went to apply for a second year-long policy in 2024, they once again failed to inform them of all the drama on the movie. And here’s the wildest part. Even though Wayfairer was legally obligated to let the insurance company know of the drama with the uncredited director of It Ends With Us, they didn’t. And that nullifies their insurance policies, Harkco says. However, despite the basement manager filing her lawsuit in December of 2024, Baldoni and Wayfairer didn’t give notice of her lawsuit until April, just a few months ago. And at that time, they had the audacity to ask for indemnity under the 2024 policy. Y’all, I’ve said this time and time again. I’m not team Baldoni. I’m clearly not team Lively. I am team the truth. And if what this insurance company is saying is true, that’s a real bad look for the Wayfairer parties. Understandably, obviously, after the Wayfair company asked for indemnity under its 2024 policy, Harko, whom at that point, April of this year, was fully well aware of all the drama that happened cuz hello, they pay attention to the news. Harko denied the claim. In a letter last month, the insurance company explained that there are circumstances that may wholly or partially limit coverage. Justin Beldoni is personally named as one of the defendants in Harko’s justfiled lawsuit, as are it Ends With Us Movie LLC, Wayfairer CEO Jamie Heath, and Wayfairer co-founder and co-chairman Steve Sorrowowitz. Now, let’s park aside this major allegation not being a good look. There is some good news. As I’ve told you previously, my sources tell me exclusively that, and actually this has been mentioned in legal filings from Team Plantation Pinocchio, the unliftable Blake Lively has already shared publicly After I told you that Steve Sorrowitz, the billionaire, is bankrolling all of Justin Baldon’s legal bills, all of the Wayfairer parties, every single one of them, the defendants don’t have to pay the millions upon millions, possibly over $10 million in legal fees by now. Yeah, it’s crazy expensive. That’s one of the reasons why I’m representing myself in subpoena gate. For years, I have been represented by Brian Freriedman, Justin Baldon’s lawyer, cuz I needed the best. But I’m going to handle subpoena gate myself cuz I don’t want to pay for the best. Cuz as I’ve said, I’m not being sued. I’m just being subpoenaed. And worst case scenario, nothing real, nothing bad will happen to me. I’ve thought this through. And that’s update number one. Update number two. The lip nibbler and Beldon’s former digital samurai Jed Wallace are fighting it out in Texas. Jed Wallace was recently dismissed from the high school graduates lawsuit in New York in federal court because of lack of jurisdiction. But his litigation against her continues in Texas where he filed a lawsuit first and where he lives and works. Wallace just recently filed a motion for an order requiring the parties to confer and submit a proposed scheduling order to the court. My takeaway from that was I’m pretty confident that the shampoo company owner didn’t think that Jed Wallace would be dismissed from her lawsuit. So, she made no progress to move things along in Texas. And after he was dismissed in New York, Jed Wallace said, “Hello, let’s get this over with.” Well, today Blake Lively has filed a response to that motion for an order requiring the parties to confer and submit a proposed scheduling order. Her Texas attorney says both parties agree with requesting that the court hold an initial status conference. Despite this, plaintiffs have filed a motion to compel asking the court to mandate that the parties engage in a rule 26F conference for the sole purpose of starting discovery in a case over which many threshold issues remain pending. Whether the first to file rule demands dismissal. Whether there is personal jurisdiction over Miss Lively. whether venue is proper in this district and whether the plaintiff’s sole defamation claim has merit. Pause. If the judge said that jurisdiction is not applicable in her trial in New York, it has to happen in Texas then, right? Today’s response continues saying, “Judge Lyman has squarely addressed the merits of the claim brought by plaintiffs herein for defamation arising out of Miss Lively’s filing of a CRD complaint and held that there is no cognisable claim for defamation because the statements made therein are privileged as a matter of law.” Plaintiffs Jed Wallace and his street relations further refer to their multiple attempts to engage Miss Lively’s council in a conference when council has heard nothing from plaintiffs since the week of June 16th when council was out of the country. Instead, plaintiffs have focused their attention on the first filed case in the Southern District of New York, engaging in a multitude of filings involving discovery disputes and refusing to produce Wallace for a deposition. So, Dead Wallace has not been deposed yet. and they got real spicy in a footnote after revealing that saying in the footnote, “Plaintiffs have repeatedly represented in the Southern District of New York that plaintiff Wallace’s current health condition prevents him from fully engaging in discovery, which further begs the question of why the rush to start discovery in this case.” saying one thing there and another thing here. Oh, this is ridiculous. They’re now bringing up the floods that happened. Oh my god. Dulu’s lawyer says in the intervening time in Texas, the Hill Country, most specifically Hunt, Texas in Kerr County, experienced catastrophic flooding resulting in the loss of more than 100 lives. Lead counsel for Miss Lively has family and property and like others has lost people she knows in the flood ravaged community of Hunt, Texas. Still, after a month of silence, plaintiffs council reached out by email on July 17th, imposing an arbitrary deadline for a response of the next day at noon, despite being advised that council was out of town with intermittent connectivity. Fortunately, Miss Lively’s council was able to respond to the arbitrary demand by noon the next day. Plaintiffs Wallace and Street Relation responded by filing an unnecessary and mislabeled motion to compel. As previously indicated, Miss Lively does not oppose an initial status conference with this court. What she does oppose is starting discovery at this time, while preliminary issues of jurisdiction and venue are yet to be decided. And when Judge Lyman has ruled that defamation claims arising out of Miss Lively’s CRD complaint, the exact claim raised herein lack merit and cannot survive a rule 12B6 motion. Respectfully submitted. So yes, I am monitoring and will keep you updated on all the Texas drama. And finally, our third update. A new article claims, quote, Blake Lively’s life in hiding. Allies tell why she doesn’t want to be seen out and who she’s leaning on as famous friends desert her. All right, my friend. That is all. This is a lot. Let’s discuss everything including the insurance drama in the comment section.

🫠 #JustinBaldoni #BlakeLively #TaylorSwift

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join

Listen to The Perez Hilton Podcast with Chris Booker HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com

Sign up for my Patreon and get lots of exclusive content at http://Patreon.com/PerezHilton

Follow Me!
MAIN CHANNEL: http://youtube.com/PerezHilton
WEBSITE: http://PerezHilton.com
PEREZ’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/PerezHilton
GET A PERSONALIZED VIDEO FROM ME HERE: https://www.cameo.com/perezhilton
LISTEN TO MY PODCAST HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
WEBSITE’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/ThePerezHilton

Check out my merch: http://BuyPopStuff.com

About Perez Hilton:
The original influencer, Perez Hilton founded and oversees one of the most iconic websites ever. In addition to his eponymous blog, he is the host of a very successful podcast, has a loyal following across two YouTube channels, has written four books, has acted in countless TV shows and films – as well as the stage. And, most importantly, he is the proud father of three happy and thriving kids and an adult child, his mother. Perez is one of the most sought after commentators and your best friend!

Justin Baldoni Sued AGAIN Because Of Blake Lively! In This Just-Filed Complaint:

Perez Hilton
https://www.youtube.com/perezhilton