Blake Lively’s Judge Slams Baldoni’s Lawyers For Abusing The Court Docket AND Gives Her Another Win!

Blake Lively’s Judge Slams Baldoni’s Lawyers For Abusing The Court Docket AND Gives Her Another Win!

My hair. Oh my god. Hello my friend. It is Perez, the queen of all media, the original influencer, worldrenowned journalist, and your number one source for everything. It ends with us. Saga. Earlier today, the judge in the Imagined Victims lawsuit against Justin Baldoni put me on blast. lying Lyman literally scolded me publicly and I will respond to that. But first I need to draft a letter and then I will share it with you all. This video is not about that. It’s about a ruling that he just handed over a win to latigious Lively. I’m a little bit of a hot mess cuz oh my god, you might not even see this video today. I’m gonna have to make it in chunks and hope that I can figure out how to do this with very limited Wi-Fi. Look at this. I’m in a cabin. I’m in the woods. Oh my god. It is beautiful here. Oh my god. Oh, this is beautiful. But understandably not very good Wi-Fi and not good cell phone reception either. Oh my god, I got lost coming here last night. I was freaking out. I’m like, “Oh my god, I have no cell reception. I What? Oh my god.” Thankfully, I was able to figure it out. And here we are. I’m still catching up on everything, but I did see not only the judge’s ruling in her favor today, which we will get to. I also saw that subpoena Serena is targeting a Spanish language creator in South America. Does Vander Krookson really believe that the Wayfairer defendants were coordinating with a tuber making vids down in Argentina I favor? Also, spoiler alert, this subpoena against Declar, I love that name. this subpoena against Declar TV. Shout out to Mi O Lo. I actually think it’s just one guy. Um, this subpoena is not enforcable. According to his own information, this creator, Declarot TV, is based out of Argentina. Judge Lyman, the Southern District of New York, where her subpoena was issued from, has no jurisdiction over this creator. Ridiculo. What is not ridiculous, however, is the judge’s ruling. Remember, we discussed this already. The drama over her full deposition that the Wayfairer parties submitted as evidence. Now, here’s why I really am all about keeping it real and team the truth. I said when discussing this with you all that that was extra and unnecessary. I’m team the truth and I call it like I see it. If the wayfairer parties had relevant information from Dulu’s deposition that they wanted to present to the judge, they just needed to present that piece of her deposition, which lasted an entire day, like eight hours. I called it out in my video discussing this as unnecessary, inappropriate, but I wasn’t mad at it. Lawyers are gonna lawyer on both sides, but I still call a spade a spade. And the judge this ruling, um, let’s go over it. He says, “On August 1st, 2025, Council for the Wayfairer parties and Liner Freriedman Titleman Kulie LLP, Liner Freriedman filed a letter with the court.” The letter see docket number 538 ostensibly responding to arguments made by council for Blake Lively. Lively regarding Liner Freriedman’s pending motion to quash a subpoena. See docket number 533. The letter broadly asserts that there is no evidence the Wayfairer parties, Brian Freriedman or his firm have participated in a smear campaign against Lively. For support, the letter quotes one fragment of one sentence from Lively’s deposition. [Music] In the deposition, Lively testifies that she believes that the Wayfairer parties have retaliated against her for reporting harassment by engaging in an ongoing smear campaign, but she parentheses appropriately refuses to reveal information disclosed to her in confidence by her counsel. The letter also includes as an attachment the entire uncertified 292page transcript of Lively’s deposition. Lively now moves under federal rule of civil procedure 12F and the court’s inherent power to strike the attachment on the grounds that there is no conceivable legal purpose to file the whole transcript. Lively argues that the Wayfairer parties have included the entire transcript solely for strategic media and public relations purposes. Specifically, given the court’s individual practices regarding sealed materials, the Wayfairer party’s decision has put Lively in the position of defending the continued sealing of the transcript. Lively contends the Wayfairer parties have done so in order to advance a false narrative that Miss Lively is afraid of her deposition testimony becoming public, which is entirely untrue. It is seems really true to me. The judge however says the court agrees that inclusion of the entire deposition transcript served no proper purpose and accordingly grants the motion to strike. Courts have the inherent power to manage their own affairs so as to achieve the orderly and expeditious disposition of cases. This includes the power to strike materials outside the pleadings that are abusive or otherwise improper. The second circuit has explained that a court’s supervisory function over its docket is not only within a district court’s power but also among its responsibilities. Courts must therefore protect the judicial process from being co-opted and ensure that their dockets are not used to gratify private spite or promote public scandal. It goes both ways, Judge Lyman. They have done that as well. You know it. We all know it. uh he would like us to believe otherwise saying the Wayfairer party’s attachment of the entire nearly 300page deposition after citing only two pages of it in the letter served no proper litigation purpose and instead appears to have been intended to burden Lively and as a result the court and to invite public speculation Pence scandal. Even if the cited deposition portions were relevant or provided support for the Wayfairer party’s arguments, both of which are far from clear, the Wayfairer parties have not even attempted to argue that the entire deposition was relevant, nor could they. The conclusion is inescapable that the Wayfairer parties filed gratuitous amounts of irrelevant pages so that if Lively moved for continued sealing of the irrelevant pages, the Wayfairer parties could then use Lively’s response for their own public relations purposes. The court has not only the power but also the responsibility to step in to step in. Kaka and the judge is mad. He included a footnote that says, “The Wayf Farer party’s actions follow a pattern of using filings on the docket as an opportunity to litigate this case in the press rather than in court. The court has already stricken from the record prior filings made by the Wayfairer parties for improper purpose of inviting a press uproar. The court has likewise disregarded as improper attachments to other filings. Seems like the court has just done that for the wayfairer parties even though the plaintiff’s lawyers have done the same. Lying lyman also says the wayfairer parties offer several responses none persuasive. First, they observe that rule 12F does not authorize this court to strike documents other than pleadings. They do not dispute, however, that the court has the inherent authority to strike documents other than pleadings when filed for improper purposes. Indeed, the court has already done so in this very case. Next, they contend that Lively has not asserted that the deposition transcript contains abusive, improper, or lielist materials. But that is not the test. The test is whether the Wayfairer party’s filing itself was abusive or improper. And given that there could have been no proper reason for the wayfairer parties to have filed an entire transcript when only a few lines were even arguably relevant. Lively has demonstrated that the wayfairer parties have abused this court’s docket. Finally, the Wayfairer parties explained that it is routine for the court to consider deposition testimony in connection with discovery dispute. It is not routine, however, for parties to attach an entire confidential deposition transcript when citing only limited portions of that transcript involving only a few lines of text. in order to put the other side and the court to the burden of justifying continued sealing. All right, I agree and I said that publicly. Therefore, Lively’s motion to strike the attachment is granted as there is no cause to seal the limited portion of the transcript cited by the wayfairer parties in the letter. Lively is directed to publicly file only the relevant portions. Furthermore, because the only portion of the letter that is currently redacted is the portion of the transcript that the court now orders unsealed, the court will also unseal the letter. The clerk of court is directed to close dockets number 537 and 540, to unseal number 538, and to strike the attachment at number 5381. So ordered. And a reminder, my response to the judge’s order on me is coming up. Maybe today, maybe tomorrow, but I’m going to take my time to give the right response. You better believe it. Until then, let’s discuss everything in this latest ruling and anything else in the comments section. See you there.

👨‍⚖️ #BlakeLivey #JustinBaldoni #TaylorSwift

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join

Listen to The Perez Hilton Podcast with Chris Booker HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com

Sign up for my Patreon and get lots of exclusive content at http://Patreon.com/PerezHilton

Follow Me!
MAIN CHANNEL: http://youtube.com/PerezHilton
WEBSITE: http://PerezHilton.com
PEREZ’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/PerezHilton
GET A PERSONALIZED VIDEO FROM ME HERE: https://www.cameo.com/perezhilton
LISTEN TO MY PODCAST HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
WEBSITE’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/ThePerezHilton

Check out my merch: http://BuyPopStuff.com

About Perez Hilton:
The original influencer, Perez Hilton founded and oversees one of the most iconic websites ever. In addition to his eponymous blog, he is the host of a very successful podcast, has a loyal following across two YouTube channels, has written four books, has acted in countless TV shows and films – as well as the stage. And, most importantly, he is the proud father of three happy and thriving kids and an adult child, his mother. Perez is one of the most sought after commentators and your best friend!

Blake Lively’s Judge Declares That Justin Baldoni’s Lawyers Have Been Abusing The Court’s Docket! Reprimands Them AND Gives Her Another Win – Of Course! He Just:

Perez Hilton
https://www.youtube.com/perezhilton