Justin Baldoni Is Harassing Young Actress, Claims Isabela Ferrer’s Lawyer! This Is Wild:

Justin Baldoni Is Harassing Young Actress, Claims Isabela Ferrer’s Lawyer! This Is Wild:

And just like that, I am hooked back in. Hello my frame. It is Perez, the queen of all media, the original influencer, journalist, podcaster, and your number one source for everything. It ends with us. Saga. This saga is better than any soap opera because it’s real. And there are more twists and turns. This latest development has just caused me to go, “What?” Just a few days ago, I told you all that team Baldon Wayfairer filed a motion to serve a subpoena on young Lily Bloom. They had been trying to serve her, so they went to the court to file this request for alternative service. We have seen the docket duchess use this play many times and her lap dog, Judge Lyman, granting those requests repeatedly. So, it seemed sensible to me that the Baldoni Wayfairer parties would do the same. Especially because according to them, the Nepo baby, that’s right, Isabelle Ferrer is the granddaughter of the late Rosemary Clooney and George Clooney is her second cousin. I just I messed that up. Isabella Ferrer. I’m probably going to mess that up again, you guys. Here and now. I am confirming her name is Isabella Ferrer, but if I say Isabelle, just go with it, okay? They claim that she was evading being subpoenaed, even though they had been in communications with her lawyer, who then ghosted them. Well, like Jesus, young Lily Bloom’s lawyer is back from the dead and just filed an explosive game changer with Judge Lyman. Let’s get into it. And yes, some of you might remember that Isabelle Ferrer was on Justin Baldon’s side until Blake Papini sunk her claws into her back in July of 2023, a year before this drama became public. Isabelle Ferrer texted Justin Beloni thanking him for such a wonderful experience on the set of It Ends With Us. Isabelle filmed for just 4 days and did not act opposite of the authorship thief. But then, as many of you know, promo for the movie began. And unfortunately for him, the Lively Liar alienated Baldoni from the rest of the cast. The Grifting Girly did the promo with Isabelle Ferrer and the rest of the actors and without the director or initial director before he was replaced. And then in the fall of last year, in October to be exact, well after the film’s August release and promotion was over, Isabelle Ferrer and Butthole Lively were spotted out to dinner together in New York City. Mhm. In July of 2023, she texted Belon, “I have to say, thank you so much for an incredible experience on my first film. I still can’t shake the feeling of it all because it truly was life-changing for me. You are such a wonderful, smart, and sincere director, and you created such a comfortable, safe space for me to feel like I could fully step into this role. I couldn’t have asked for a more welcoming environment. It will stay with me for the rest of my life. Well, things sure have changed. Isabella’s lawyer, who could accept service on her behalf, just filed a motion telling Judge Lyman, Slimy Lyman, not to grant the Baldoni wayfairer’s request for alternative service. Huh? Why? Young Lily Bloom’s lawyer tells the court, quote, “The instant motion for leave to serve third party Isabella Ferrer by alternative service motion is yet another attempt by Justin Baldoni and his affiliated entities collectively Baldoni to harass nonparty Isabella Ferrer and draw her deeper into litigation and disputes she has done her best to avoid. This is Miss Ferrer’s first filing in this court, but she was pulled into the discovery fray in February 2025 when Blake Lively delivered a subpoena to her Lively subpoena to delve into allegations about Miss Ferrer that Baldoni included in his original complaint. In response, Miss Ferrer tendered a demand for indemnity to It Ends With Us Movie LLC as mandated in her day weekly player contract for theatrical motion pictures acting agreement, which by the way, the Baldon Wayfairer parties agreed to. They agreed to that. I looked at all of the exhibits, the evidence, the receipts that Isabella’s lawyer submitted, and team Baldon Wayfairer said, “Okay, we’ll do that.” From that point forward, her lawyer tells Lion Lyman, quote, “Balddon has tried to manipulate, threaten, control, and otherwise act inappropriately towards Miss Ferrer. You know what I find very telling about this? The decision to call Baldoni and the Wayfairer parties Baldoni instead of the Wayfairer defendants or the Baldoni defendants or anything else but Baldon. saying Baldoni when they’re talking about more than just Justin was a calculated move here. Her lawyer says in fact Baldon’s legal team has gone as far as citing a phony case which Miss Ferrer’s council discovered as an AI hallucination to support a frivolous legal position. They don’t mention what that is. Usually, a good lawyer, not me, because I’m not a lawyer and I’ve filed some hallucinations, uh, would add a footnote letting the judge know what they’re talking about. Isabella’s lawyer did not do that. But it does not stop there. The letter continues, but it did not stop there. See what I did there? The filing of the instant motion is yet another attempt to manipulate the press. Pause. Are we sure Ryan Reynolds did not write this or ethically challenged Ezra? It’s got their fingerprints all over it. I think in my opinion the filing of the instant motion is yet another attempt to manipulate the press to create havoc on a young upand cominging and talented actress and to violate this court’s policies on the publishing of nonparty personally identifying information. Pause. This is absolutely Ezra in action. I think I believe my opinion allegedly. And why I believe that is because there’s a lot of misrepresentation happening here. Now, you know, I’m team the truth. And when the Baldon Wayfairer parties listed Isabella Ferrer’s two known home addresses, what did I do? I called them out on that publicly. I said they could have filed that redacted version for the public docket and the unredacted version under seal for the court and the Baldon Wayfair parties did not. However, when they did that, even though I disagreed with that decision and I called them out for it publicly, they did not violate the court’s policies on the publishing of nonparty personally identifying information. Don’t get it twisted. You don’t need to lie or misrepresent the truth. Be honest, lawyers. Her lawyer continues, “As set forth herein, there is no need for the court to grant the pressgarnering motion, but instead sanction Beldon for engaging in such obvious sharp practice.” Huh? Sanction? Or how’s about you just accept the subpoena like you accepted the one from Blondie? No. Her lawyer says the primary reason to deny the motion is that it fails to meet the applicable legal standard for the relief Baldon seeks. Baldoni prematurely brought the motion without conducting the diligence necessary to support a motion for leave to serve a discovery subpoena on Miss Ferrer by means other than personal service. The motion discloses no efforts made by Baldoni to determine Miss Ferrer’s actual residential or business address. nor does it offer a cintilla, that’s a good word, of evidence to demonstrate that Miss Ferrer has in any way attempted to avoid personal service of Baldon’s July 3rd, 2025 document subpoena. The Baldon subpoena. Brah, why are you wasting the court’s time and don’t just accept the subpoena? Her lawyer says, “To the contrary, by responding to the lively subpoena, Miss Ferrer has already proven that when faced with a valid subpoena in this matter, she will comply with her obligations. There is no proper foundation to support the motion, and Baldon’s true motivations will be revealed herein.” Unfortunately, the motion is just the latest in a broader pattern of conduct by Baldoni to bully Miss Ferrer. That’s a big accusation. Earlier, Baldoni tried to leverage compliance with contractual indemnity obligations owed to Miss Ferrer in an effort to take control of Miss Ferrer’s response to the lively subpoena. Baldoni then tried to leverage compliance with those same indemnity obligations as a quidd proquo for Miss Ferrer to instruct her attorney to accept service of the Baldoni subpoena on her behalf. Stated another way, thank you. Baldoni refused to honor contractual obligations unless Miss Ferrer agreed to certain demands. Miss Ferrer rightfully refused to tie her indemnity rights to any other issue in Baldon’s dispute with Lively. While Miss Ferrer will faithfully comply with her legal obligations under any subpoena, summons, or court order, she will obviously not be intimidated or extorted by any party to otherwise participate in the proceedings. It seems like a misrepresentation again. I don’t know. Finally, though the motion does not directly raise the substance of the Baldoni subpoena, the court should consider it when determining whether to give Baldon special treatment for the manner in which it is served. Oh boy. No. No, baby. No, baby. No. No. No. No. No. Snively would not be giving Baldon special treatment. the judge would be giving him equal treatment because he’s agreed to do this for Lab Bruha many times. Young Lily Bloom’s lawyer though says even the most cursory review of the Baldoni subpoena demonstrates its harassing nature. For example, it demands the production of all documents produced in connection with any subpoena in the action. How the hell is that harassing? The attorney says there is no rational reason to demand that Miss Ferrer, who is not a party to this action, reproduce materials that have already been produced by her or others in the litigation. All right, that makes sense. Dot dot dot, but not really. It would make sense in a normal situation. However, team ridicula has accused the Baldoni wayfairer parties of submitting incomplete evidence. They don’t trust him and the other defendants. And if I have to read between the lines, it seems to me that the Baldoni wayfairer parties might think that Isabelle Ferrer has come under the influence of Pinocchio and might also not have been fully forthcoming, did not produce everything that was requested. This is nasty. This is a nasty, nasty, nasty, nasty, nasty ongoing litigation. So, Young Lily’s lawyer says, “For all these reasons which are discussed at length below, Miss Ferrer respectfully asks the court to deny the motion in its entirety and impose appropriate sanctions against Baldon. Listen, I do feel bad for this girl, especially cuz as this says, although her role in the film was important, she only spent four days on set and was paid a small sum for her work. She has little to do with the operative facts and events of this case, but that has not stopped her from being pulled into the dispute by Baldoni in a number of different ways. Um, but yeah, according to you yourselves, La Lively pulled young Lily into this first. Keep it real and equal. And remember those text messages that I read to you earlier? They bring that up. Isabella’s lawyer says the 179page complaint Baldon filed against Lively makes four direct references to Miss Ferrer and includes screenshots of a few text messages Miss Ferrer sent. Not surprisingly, some of the text messages Miss Ferrer sent Beldoni were very positive and included the types of comments one would expect from a young actress to make to the director and producer of her first feature film. Baldoni used these texts to craft the narrative that after Miss Ferrer spent substantial time with Lively during film promotions, Miss Ferrer felt compelled to shun Baldon in repudiation of her warm words. Yeah, it sure does seem like that. And you’re only making it seem more so now. However, her lawyer says Baldon’s complaint made no other allegations that directly reference Miss Ferrer. Baldon’s lawyer crafted narrative is far from reality or the true facts. But nonetheless, it created a situation where even those minimal allegations were enough to drag Miss Ferrer into this litigation. stated more bluntly. Belon appropriate. Oh god. Ryan Reynolds you scab scabbing some more. Stated more bluntly. Baldoni appropriated Miss Ferrer’s narrative without her permission simply to create a selfserving image for the public and the press. Ironically, the allegations against Baldoni are those that mimic a harasser, and his recent actions surely support that view. Wow. I mean, I definitely think the Baldon Wayfairer parties could have handled this better. Look at me. Team truth. Again, according to this filing to the court, Isabella’s lawyer says it ends with us LLC conditionally agreed to indemnify Miss Ferrer as required by the acting agreement. The condition, however, was a serious one. The February 28th letter demanded that Miss Ferrer confirm that she will surrender control of her response to Wayfairer. I don’t think that was necessary drama. the filing says, meaning the Baldoni team sought to respond for Miss Ferrer however they wanted, not actually allowing Miss Ferrer to provide the documents that reveal the true facts. Wow, this is explosive. This is explosive. The true facts. How this is all worded. This is a big hit. I think this is real bad for the Baldon Wayfair parties. It’s bad. Period. And pre all of this, Justin Baldon would have said so, too. Her lawyer continues, “Miss Ferrer was not willing to turn over control of her response to the lively subpoena to Baldoni or anyone else for that matter, which led to a protracted dispute over It Ends With Us LLC’s indemnity obligations.” Aspects of that dispute help explain Miss Ferrer’s frustration with her dealings with Belon and his council with him directly as well as the distrust those dealings have fostered. Drama, drama, drama, trauma, drama. They say it ends with us LLC fought over its claimed right to control Miss Ferrer’s response to the lively subpoena or at a minimum unilaterally select her council. Jeez Louise. They also claim that Belon tried to pressure her by making Isabella incur legal costs. Her lawyer tells the judge, “It ends with us movies LLC’s conduct in negotiating the terms of the indemnity greatly delayed the process and any related indemnification to Miss Ferrer in a transparent attempt to put financial pressure on Miss Ferrer as her legal costs mounted. Those delays continued even after the parties entered into a written contract in late May 2025, which defined a process that would allow a neutral retired judge to review Miss Ferrer’s attorney invoices to determine whether the services and fees build are subject to indemnification under the acting agreement. Y’all, oh my god, I keep going back to what I told you all a couple of days ago. If Baldoni and his producing partner had agreed to release that cockarrific statement that the second wife of Ryan Reynolds wanted him to put out. So much drama and turmoil and millions and in the case of this girl tens of thousands would have been saved and just the energy and just oh god craziness. It’s all this is all so crazy. They tell the judge. In fact, it was during the time period when Miss Ferrer was pushing to engage the agreed upon neutral judge that Baldon reached out to Miss Ferrer’s attorney about accepting service of the Baldon subpoena. Although the motion discusses the initial part of that outreach, it omits the salient facts that followed in violation of the well settled obligation of cander to a tribunal. They claim Baldon made accepting service of the Baldoni subpoena a quidd proquo to move forward with the process for handling contractual indemnification obligations owed to Miss Ferrer. meaning they were dragging their feet agreeing to pay this girl all of the legal fees that she was incurring in relation to now the two subpoenas. Additionally, they are salty because they claim Baldon’s motion for alternative service led to negative publicity for Miss Ferrer. That is true. They then go and argue all of the relevant case law and why the judge should side with team young Lily Bloom. Oh, good news. We find out now that neither of the two addresses that were listed on the public court docket are where Isabella Ferrer live. Good to know. But they also argue that the Baldon Wayfairer parties did not do their due diligence in trying to find her home address or business address. Maybe because they didn’t feel like they needed to. They were talking to her lawyer and her lawyer is doubling down saying the purpose of that the motion for alternative service and the underlying subpoena is to harass Miss Ferrer as part of a broader coordinated campaign against her. Oh my god, I’m getting PTSD from the language. This has Lively Reynolds all over it. But they do make some good points and so far they have made some good points. It says here, “A subpoena that requires a nonparty to produce documents produced in connection with any subpoena in the action is not aimed at uncovering new evidence or information. Those documents are by their very nature materials the parties have readily available to them in the litigation. But remember what I said about the distrust. Instead, the motion and the Baldon subpoena are transparent efforts to exert pressure on Miss Ferrer, both in this litigation and in connection. Oh my god. In connection with other pending disputes. Does that mean there might be another lawsuit that is filed? I can’t handle that. I can’t handle that. No, please don’t. Isabella’s lawyer says rushing to file the motion before conducting the necessary diligence to support a proper request for service by alternative means allowed Belon to publicly disseminate addresses that could have been Miss Ferrer’s home. True. This sort of conduct from Baldoni and Lively too is not new and Baldon has been improperly attempting to exert control over Miss Ferrer ever since Miss Ferrer received the lively subpoena. They then remind the court Baldoni used the motion to publicly disseminate personally identifying information of nonparties which ball ache lively has done way more. They argue Baldon previously tried to leverage indemnity obligations owed to Miss Ferrer to control of Miss Ferrer’s response to other discovery directed to her in this litigation. And because of that, they say allowing Baldoni to use lesser alternative means to serve Miss Ferrer with the Belon subpoena effectively punishes Miss Ferrer for refusing to bend to Baldon’s intimidation and may only serve to encourage more inappropriate behavior. Ouch. They argue that Baldon’s subpoena largely covers material that Lively subpoena covered, highlighting the harassing nature of Baldon’s discovery conduct. There’s a whole section about how Baldon’s conduct warrants sanctions pursuant to rule 45, subdivision D. I should probably file a letter to the court about this. Rule 45 provides the court with the authority to protect nonparties from misuse of the subpoena process. More specifically, rule 45D1 allows the court to monetarily sanction a party responsible for issuing and serving a subpoena where the party fails to take reasonable steps to avoid imposing undue burden or expense on a person subject to the subpoena. Good to know. The measure of sanctions prescribed by rule 45D includes the attorney’s fees and expenses incurred in challenging the sanctionable conduct. That’s probably a lot by now. Expensive lawyers for months. Should the court conclude that an award of fees and costs is appropriate, Miss Ferrer respectfully requests that the court set a briefing schedule for the calculation of that award. Conclusion: Baldoni has not met the threshold for seeking to serve Miss Ferrer by means other than personal service because Baldon cannot show the requisite diligence to support such a request. Rather, Baldon filed the motion for improper purposes with the aim of harassing Miss Ferrer. Miss Ferrer respectfully asked the court to deny Baldon’s motion and take appropriate action to protect the non-party PII that Baldoni so recklessly disclosed publicly through his filing. Miss Ferrer also asks the court to consider appropriate sanctions against Baldoni for his bad faith tactics. Respectfully submitted. And this this is why I’m so good, y’all. This is why I’m so good. I’ve said it time and time again. It would not surprise me if both sides eventually agree to a settlement and maybe even soonish. The longer this drags on, the worse it is, I think, for both sides. Mhm. This filing, not a good look for Justin and crew. However, I’m really curious to see their response. We should hear both sides. Wild, what do you think of this all? Let’s discuss everything in the comments section. die.

🫠 #JustinBaldoni #BlakeLively #IsabelaFerrer

Join this channel to get access to perks:
https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCaHE2Xd6bhJbfM7T1TAmI9Q/join

Listen to The Perez Hilton Podcast with Chris Booker HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com

Sign up for my Patreon and get lots of exclusive content at http://Patreon.com/PerezHilton

Follow Me!
MAIN CHANNEL: http://youtube.com/PerezHilton
WEBSITE: http://PerezHilton.com
PEREZ’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S INSTAGRAM: http://Instagram.com/PerezHilton
GET A PERSONALIZED VIDEO FROM ME HERE: https://www.cameo.com/perezhilton
LISTEN TO MY PODCAST HERE: http://PerezPodcast.com
WEBSITE’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S FACEBOOK: http://Facebook.com/ThePerezHilton
WEBSITE’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/PerezHilton
PEREZ’S TWITTER: http://Twitter.com/ThePerezHilton

Check out my merch: http://BuyPopStuff.com

About Perez Hilton:
The original influencer, Perez Hilton founded and oversees one of the most iconic websites ever. In addition to his eponymous blog, he is the host of a very successful podcast, has a loyal following across two YouTube channels, has written four books, has acted in countless TV shows and films – as well as the stage. And, most importantly, he is the proud father of three happy and thriving kids and an adult child, his mother. Perez is one of the most sought after commentators and your best friend!

Justin Baldoni Is Harassing Young Actress, Claims Isabela Ferrer’s Lawyer! This Is Wild:

Perez Hilton
https://www.youtube.com/perezhilton