Actress Lucy Boynton slams anti-intimacy coordinator rhetoric, praises the profession and says they should be mandatory.

    Posted by bruxellexs

    Share.

    8 Comments

    1. Important-Raccoon661 on

      Whenever someone says they didn’t use one it’s giving “I’m not like the other girls”.

    2. scrotalsmoothie on

      Is this supposed to be some sort of flex not using one or something, like “I know how to be intimate,” kind of thing?

      Why would you not want guidance at your finger tips if not just the comfort of appropriateness and accountability?

    3. thehonestbreadloaf on

      Assuming this is about the whole JLaw thing, it feels really ignorant to basically be like “I don’t need one because I’m just going based off the vibe of the other person.” Doesn’t diminish the value of your work to use one.

    4. Murky_Chemical891 on

      She’s right and she should say it.

      They keep implying that using an intimacy coordinator means you don’t trust the men that you’re working with when that’s not the point of an intimacy coordinator.

    5. Only-Succotash-9720 on

      I just deleted a comment on the last post on here regarding intimacy coordinators cause I felt like I had gone on too much of a rant. Refreshed the page and saw this post and she worded this so much better than I could have. So happy to see people advocating for people on set other than whoever the star is

    Leave A Reply