It’s safe to say Lisa Kudrow just ๐“น๐“ฒ๐“ฟ๐“ธ๐“ฝ๐“ฎ๐“ญ her stance on the “We were on a break” debate. ๐Ÿ˜‚

More from Entertainment Tonight: https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCdtXPiqI2cLorKaPrfpKc4g?sub_confirmation=1

Exclusives from #EntertainmentTonight :

Share.

17 Comments

  1. In woman-speak, on a break means the guy goes into an indefinite holding pattern until she decides if she wants him back or not. Most younger men will cheat. Older guys will often say, screw your break, I'm done.

  2. I agree I always have been on Rachel's side, but Rachel was ridiculous when he was getting married. The dude from House was right; she was a terrible person๐Ÿ˜…

  3. They were both wrong, cause Rachel never admitted it was actually a break. "I think we should take a break. From us"
    And of course it's a spectacularly horrible move to instantly sleep with the copy girl:P
    But the copy girl was hitting on and (I think) was taking advantage of a drunk, and clearly vulnerable guy.
    Everyone was wrong here.

  4. Always been Team Rachel, because if you consider that they were NOT on a break then Ross was a cheater but if they WERE on a break then it still would make no sense that a man would move on with another THAT fast if he was in love with Rachel for like 10 years.

    And ridiculously he wanted Rachel back immediately.
    Benefit of doubt he wasnt a cheater

    But what kind of way is that to deal with a fight.

    And its also extremely icky ๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚๐Ÿ˜‚

  5. He said โ€œcastingโ€ he wanted to make sure the characters were good. Not that Leo isnโ€™t talented but how are you with Kate ya know

  6. I get the feeling that she is actually speaking more broadly here, answering the question in relation to the whole show; I think the cast and viewers were mostly wanting R+R to end up together but have now seen Rossโ€™s immature ways.

Leave A Reply