I mean, Swift is no stranger to frivolous lawsuits and ridiculous copyrights. She’s just not used to receiving them.
After all, this is the woman who insisted that passionately yelling something at the climax of a bridge is plagiarism and tried to copyright the phrase “shake it off” on damn near everything.
Maybe this will encourage her and her team to stop?
_Cerca_Trova_ on

ahdidi413 on
“In the lawsuit, Wade accuses Swift of ignoring her trademark. She says her brand has been undermined, with consumers believing that she copied the singer. “The continued erosion of that mark threatens the entirety of” Wade’s brand, the complaint states.”
This is the key here. On the surface this case does feel like a reach, but if Wade can prove that they have lost business or otherwise had their reputation (no swift pun intended) impacted, there may be something here. If suddenly an established brand loses a ton of engagement, especially since Swift’s trademark request was denied, this isn’t a total nothing-burger. Swift may have to seriously consider buying out the existing trademark.
AndrewRyanMcC on
I mean Taylor did try to stop a bedding company from trademarking “Swift Home”. If she thinks she can take ownership over the word “swift” then I’m fine with someone doing the same to her over a phrase lol
VeterinarianAware989 on
not to be a super cunt but she has less than 2k followers and “showgirl” was introduced into the dictionary in 1836 so this feels like a wild stretch tbh
pumpkin_paperback on

longblack90 on
IMO ‘of a showgirl’ is too common unfortunately, the substantial/defining part of the mark would be the combination with ‘confessions’. As much as I’d like this to be a Katy/Katie Perry sitch (including the underdog win).
enolaholmes23 on
Good. The Taylor Swift brand has been stealing songs and brands for far too long.
rabid_cheese_enjoyer on
lol
lmao
zotobom on

joodee3 on
Mm… I’m not a fan of Taylor but I feel like using “of a showgirl” is pretty broad. It’s not like the first person coined the word showgirl or even made it popular. But then again I’m not a copyright lawyer either!
osantal on
I know Maren, she’s not a dummy and has legit poured a ton of money into her brand. I wish her success with the suit.
cherrystillness on
get her!
LipstickSingularity on
Was fully expecting it to be Countess Luanne as the plaintiff
17 Comments
[deleted]
I don’t think you can own “…of a Showgirl”?
This isn’t making it infront of a judge
I mean, Swift is no stranger to frivolous lawsuits and ridiculous copyrights. She’s just not used to receiving them.
After all, this is the woman who insisted that passionately yelling something at the climax of a bridge is plagiarism and tried to copyright the phrase “shake it off” on damn near everything.
Maybe this will encourage her and her team to stop?

“In the lawsuit, Wade accuses Swift of ignoring her trademark. She says her brand has been undermined, with consumers believing that she copied the singer. “The continued erosion of that mark threatens the entirety of” Wade’s brand, the complaint states.”
This is the key here. On the surface this case does feel like a reach, but if Wade can prove that they have lost business or otherwise had their reputation (no swift pun intended) impacted, there may be something here. If suddenly an established brand loses a ton of engagement, especially since Swift’s trademark request was denied, this isn’t a total nothing-burger. Swift may have to seriously consider buying out the existing trademark.
I mean Taylor did try to stop a bedding company from trademarking “Swift Home”. If she thinks she can take ownership over the word “swift” then I’m fine with someone doing the same to her over a phrase lol
not to be a super cunt but she has less than 2k followers and “showgirl” was introduced into the dictionary in 1836 so this feels like a wild stretch tbh

IMO ‘of a showgirl’ is too common unfortunately, the substantial/defining part of the mark would be the combination with ‘confessions’. As much as I’d like this to be a Katy/Katie Perry sitch (including the underdog win).
Good. The Taylor Swift brand has been stealing songs and brands for far too long.
lol
lmao

Mm… I’m not a fan of Taylor but I feel like using “of a showgirl” is pretty broad. It’s not like the first person coined the word showgirl or even made it popular. But then again I’m not a copyright lawyer either!
I know Maren, she’s not a dummy and has legit poured a ton of money into her brand. I wish her success with the suit.
get her!
Was fully expecting it to be Countess Luanne as the plaintiff