This is the same letter Sophie Chandauka has reportedly described as “horrible” and “ruinous” to her reputation and Sentebale’s. And now the whole world can see it. 🤣 But reading it… it doesn’t actually come across that way? If anything, it feels like a formal resignation letter. It lays out concerns, provides examples and explains why the trustees stepped down, and sticks to what looks like typical governance language. It also says “privilege and confidential” which suggest it wasn’t widely circulated as she suggest.
Which raises a bigger question: who actually benefits from this letter being leaked and widely circulated? Because if the goal was to expose something shocking or defamatory, it kind of misses the mark. Maybe it was leaked by former trustees to counter her claim that their resignation was meant to destroy her by showing they had clearly documented concerns and handled the process in a formal, transparent way.
Posted by ProfessionalDesk9364
2 Comments
I’m ready to see a trial instead of this back and forth. It does seem to me like there is a coordinated campaign of leaks that is seeking to smear Chandauka’s name and ensure Sentabale doesn’t continue under her leadership( or any leadership that doesn’t center around Harry and what he wants). However, that’s just my view of this so far, and I’m open to changing my mind once we see actual evidence presented.
They’re all so messy!!! 😂
🍿🍿🍿🍿 nomnomnomnomnom
How do you know it’s the same letter?
If you’re citing Bower as you mentioned in your previous post,
> Chandauka had told friends that a “horrible” and
“defamatory” private dismissal letter about her was circulated to charity staff in an effort to “discredit and destroy” her.
This is a resignation letter from the trustees, how is this a dismissal letter about her as well?
Maybe it is. Maybe there’s another letter. Maybe there’s no letter and that’s not the basis of her case.
But you know I’d argue leaking this letter might support an allegation of “media campaign”. This case is either going to go to be heard in court or it’s not.
If it is heard well they may have a case and you’ll see all the evidence for or against. But to freak out by the mere fact this woman/charity has sued him is wild when you don’t even know if it’s meritless.