Close Menu
    BODYCAM-A-PALOOZA! MORE COPS CALLED IN THE VILLAGES?!!
    Celebrities2026

    BODYCAM-A-PALOOZA! MORE COPS CALLED IN THE VILLAGES?!!



    BODYCAM-A-PALOOZA! MORE COPS CALLED IN THE VILLAGES?!!

    Let’s watch more stupid footage from busybodies in The Villages that sit around making weird stuff in the garage while calling cops on the neighbors. Is it for content? Why do they do this? What is the purpose? Let’ see if we can figure it out!

    RUMBLE EXCLUSIVE: https://rumble.com/v7934go-bodycam-a-palooza-more-cops-called-in-the-villages.html?mref=bbbdj&mrefc=2

    KetoBrainz Nootropics www.ketobrainz.com promo code MUG15 for 15% off!

    Share.
    View 25 Comments

    25 Comments

    10. @aquarian3 on

      I have to be honest Megan, there was too much interrupting especially through Shara‘s video about super chats and your new sponsor. I know you’re the expert and I am very much not, I can only be honest as a viewer. Love from across the pond 😘

    14. @lyndagray6720 on

      Somebody should check to see if the Villages allow small businesses in their homes, and see if Florida requires licenses for small businesses? Does Fleasa have all necessary legal paperwork if needed?

    16. @gemma_the_what on

      Watching on Rumble replay but going to comment on here.
      I'm totally going to get some of that KetoBrainz I am also so tired.
      Also think it's hilarious how you get like 3 or 5 dislikes on there which I am guessing is Fleasa her co-host and all the people who watcher her show for her 🤣 cracks me up every time I see it.
      I wonder if Fleasa doesn't care that it loofahs bring the property value down because isn't she renting? So does that mean her rent will stay low….?🤔 Also it's a really in depth details like signs encouraging people to ask about them, and a loofah colour chart with meanings. Plus having all that on display whilst living next to children is really creepy.

    17. @allanpettinger9296 on

      With regards to his so called quashed filing ?Perhaps this invite to refile another document was in fact an invitation by the court to waste hours writing researching,filing only tj then see that again it was and will be another exercise by himself in the srt of gutility as as soon as he files it the document will not be deven read but dismissed as a filing that for one does not contain any credibility in fa tual nature and far from assisting in his dismissal plea only helps the furtherence of the plaintiffs cause by not e en reading it and againdismissing it becausecof the fact that the document not only does not have merit but is as it stands totally irrelavent to the matter it is supposed to be addressing andtherefore being as a result dismissed and quashed and denied as a result?Poor dementedd Richard Paintchips to be told his objections are nothing but an exercise in futilityand a poor one at that?

    19. @gemma_the_what on

      Ok to be honest I've never watched one of Jay hips videos impersonating Fleasas streams, I'm sorry but sometimes I can not handle Jays voice, but oh my goodness that was HILARIOUS!!!!! I loved all his characters and the comical spin on it. Jay is quite funny! I think he needs sock puppets though.🤣

    22. @lizzyfp3542 on

      On the replay here – how long has Lisa lived in The Villages? I dont think she is the origin of the rumors she's just done what she is doing to Lienette – taking advantage of a stupid thing and trying to waddle with it (I'd say run but walruses can't run!)

    23. @allanpettinger9296 on

      Now the nitty gritty Lisa is as any one can see the prime mover and instigator in all these calls to the PoPo?It would also be very enlightening why?She believes that body cam footage which has been released to a member of the public as a source of physical information via a proper FOIA request and that publically a ailable material which is by its content under that same act passed and already vetted by the releasing party ie the PoPo themselves should not be used by a third party which anyone who has now purchased the required info under that request and that info in the form of the video which that person by purchasing it,now owns it and is their property so under the rules of ownership and as its content was vetted and sold as not subject to any privacy specifications to the third party who paid for the privelage of owning said video infowhich they then diseminate to third parties ,to then as a party of public interest she tries after the fact to claim breaches of privacy against the individual concerned for having deceminated their own property that is by its nature and content a fully public document released and vetted to the specification of a nationally recognised statute and found to fall under and within those requirements as being within privacy parameters so if she has a problem with the content perhaps she as a third party should stop inserting herself into other peoples buisness?To then also claim harrassment when she is being sued in federal court by the party she claims privacy infringements and defermation as a result and siting a public recorded document as proof of said infringement would mean that he qho is now the owner of that property having purchased it is in fact not the one whom she should be appealing to but the PoPo who released that public document in the first place and recieved as a result percuniery reward as a result ,so they are the injuring party who looked at the documents vetted and cleared them to a third party and he and other deceminated them, as was their right having paid for their possession fron the PoPo?So she I am sorry but apparently she does not have a leg to stand on by her assertion and her further request to have the PoPo turn off their body cams ?Is in itself an illegal request so why?if she has nothing to hide and she is innocent Why?must the PoPo remove their body cam footage which not only protect them but also prote ts her? Could it be that there are materials contained in these videos which not only prove liability to certain acts but also prove conspiracy to involve third parties in things and accuse them of wrongdoing, when it is they who lie and perjure themselves as a result?Only time and more video evidence will prove or disprove that premise?

    Leave A Reply