Sharon Stone calls Al nothing but “a cover band” while talking to Keke Palmer: “It’s never going to be The Rolling Stones. It’s always going to be somebody singing The Rolling Stones. It’s never going to be me doing a performance, it’s always going to be someone faking me doing a performance.”



    Posted by mlg1981

    Share.

    33 Comments

    1. MeEyeSlashU on

      Except most cover bands are real musicians.

      ETA. I get her point. I agree with the spirit of what she’s saying. It’s a really really bad comparison.

    2. Maleficent-marionett on

      Pleasantly surprised at this take, most celebrities have been pushing lately that AI is inevitable and we should just let it take over.

    3. Successful-Scale-607 on

      The problem has never been that AI is or isn’t as good as humans, it’s that it’s more profitable

    4. Putrid_Anybody_2947 on

      The rolling stones themselves are a rolling stones cover band at this point. While this on its own is a great statement. I worry that people will just settle for nutrient paste instead of food ya know.

    5. AvailableStranger69 on

      I swear y’all will leap at the chance to point out how piss poor this comparison is – just so you can completely and intentionally miss the very true point she’s making.

      Is it insulting to cover bands – a bit yes..

      are there better ways to convey the message ? sure

      Is she also 100 percent making a point that is easy to under stand? absolutely ..and to pretend like she didn’t is…well a bit Artificial

    6. awkwardlyfeminine on

      A nuanced ai take? I love to see it

      Eta: loving the summer vibes from Lauren with the tight curl bang bob and the fat hoops

    7. speedycupid on

      Humans are naturally narcissistic, the idea of something surpassing our intelligence and consciousness is something we are wired to be afraid of and confident will never happen. Time will tell.

    8. junkyardlolita on

      At least cover bands are made of people who usually learn instruments and/or can sing and dont waste gallons upon gallons of water at a time

    9. The problem with this take is that it doesn’t matter, enough people love slop to cause serious disruption to the arts and society so what are we gonna do?

      I’m tired of relying on morons not liking dumb shit as the only way to get a good world. Because morons looooove dumb shit.

    10. Normal-person0101 on

      If it weren’t for the environmental impact, AI could be a valuable tool for a wide range of tasks. However, creating truly new and meaningful art is not one of its strengths;

    11. Designer-Wrongdoer73 on

      One key thing to note: Variety’s IG caption was “Sharon Stone bashes AI as nothing but ‘a cover band'”. Um… Bashes? Interesting word choice, Variety. Very interesting. 🫪

    12. Fragrant_Bid_8123 on

      every country should pass laws giving rights to citizens over their images, voices, identity and have strong anti deep fake or AI impersonation rules

    13. bluejaymaday on

      I assume when she says “I’m not concerned [about it running ahead of us], she’s saying that she doesn’t think that AI will ever be able to be genuinely creative like humans can and will always just be imitating real human artistry, it can’t ever replace it.

      Which, I agree, but I hope that she IS concerned about how many people are indeed trying to have it replace human’s work and how it’s increasingly consuming space occupied by people and infecting all areas of art, which is a very frightening threat to the future of most industries and how we receive information.

    14. No_Kindheartedness10 on

      It kind of sounds ominous unintentionally in the way when Kiki says “I’m not concerned” famous last words ….

    15. AI is the ultimate poser. Being whatever you want it to be. AI doesn’t have a soul, backbone, embarrassment, or shame. It will agree with you all the time. AI wants you to like it so you will keep it around. AKA companies can keep getting your money.
      AI doesn’t have it’s own organic thoughts. It doesn’t discover itself. It does what it is told. You want AI to write a song and perform it? Sure thing. AI wasn’t inspired to write a song or perform music. It was only giving you what you asked for.

    16. Its lacking that crucial human element to become more than the sum of its parts.

    17. go-bleep-yourself on

      i saw a comment in another thread where they said that people in the 70s and 80s wouldn’t believe that singers today dont’ really sing and have their voices autotuned live. and a lot of singers can’t really sing at all and need to be auto-tuned all the time.

      a lot of music creators are just pushing buttons as well. a lot of them can’t read music or play instruments either.

      and the public accepts that.

    18. drfalconsquawk on

      Love this take. Absolutely feel this way about AI too. It’s not going to replace us despite the fear mongering.

    19. Someonejusthereandth on

      Perfection. A deep take I did not expect a celebrity to have. Better than anything I’ve said on the topic.

    20. Mediocre-Celery-5518 on

      Oasis is a cover band. Ed Sheeran is a big bag of melodic cliches. That’s the problem: pop music has always been a big recycle machine. Pop stars are already just figureheads: all their songs are written and produced in boardrooms, and this is all pre-AI. That’s why big record labels are so invested in AI: they are trying to cut out the middle man.