I donāt expect anything less from celebrities especially nepo babies
username__0000 on
Ah yes the classic āexposureā form of payment I assume?
Anyone in a creative industry deals with this, the users take advantage of our passion.
Exposure is something people die from.
Not a form of payment.
discographyA on
I mean yeah, but I also havenāt ever seen a fashion brand that wonāt exploit to hell and back any kind of informal pap photos or anything else of a celebrity wearing their gear. It does seem a long established bit of mutual benefits. Mustāve seen at least five articles this week on Jeremy Allen White getting a new hat.
NyriasNeo on
‘They don’t like to pay’
Here is a tip. No one likes to pay. Particularly not overpriced fashion that is made by slave labor in China.
cbih on
Except they’re actually influencers who can make your brand
happysunbear on
I think we need to stop giving so much free shit to celebrities in general.
Basic-Collection5416 on
Itās called free advertising. Itās seen on celebrities and then purchased by the WAGs of c-suites. Welcome to the fashion industry, you must be new here.Ā
Clara_Geissler on
Oh that kind of rich people are def more tacky than us normal poor human being.
Little_Magician4251 on
Not sure why she did this.
Celebrity exposure is a massive part of the fashion industry and it can move the needle for brands in a way that is unmatched by any other form of marketing.
But letās just take that out of the equation-
Is there a reason Kelly could not have a formal, written manifesto for celebrities wearing her product that she shared with stylists who contacted her? No one is forced to let celebs borrow things for free, she wanted the exposure which is why she did it.
How is a stylist *asking* if their A list celeb can have free product so offensive that sheās still bitter about it a decade later?
Thatās how the industry works and much of the time itās not exploitative.
Is it cringe for wealthy celebs to ask for free stuff? Sure. Guess who else wants shit for free. Pretty much everybody.
Just as the a-list celebs had to grind to go from unknown to huge star, so do designers. It is what it is. Your market value starts at zero and you grow it through work.
Iād never heard of this woman until today but WOW her calling anything tacky is actually a compliment because her vision is seriously skewed. Iāve never seen anything tackier than her āathleisureā line, her outfits and good lord her wedding. Oh my god are we on candid camera. Iām not even trying to be mean. Her clothing is offensive to the eyes and the soul.
Seems like she had a failed business and married a rich dude. I wonder who wanted her on a podcast? Anyway she just did serious damage to any future aspirations but I get the feeling she doesnāt have any.
Also worth noting she is a āproud republicanā
RagingGrizzly60 on
I remember reading a story a few decades ago about Sharon Stone going into a store grabbing a fur coat and was about to walk out with it, when she was told to pay for it.
10 Comments
I donāt expect anything less from celebrities especially nepo babies
Ah yes the classic āexposureā form of payment I assume?
Anyone in a creative industry deals with this, the users take advantage of our passion.
Exposure is something people die from.
Not a form of payment.
I mean yeah, but I also havenāt ever seen a fashion brand that wonāt exploit to hell and back any kind of informal pap photos or anything else of a celebrity wearing their gear. It does seem a long established bit of mutual benefits. Mustāve seen at least five articles this week on Jeremy Allen White getting a new hat.
‘They don’t like to pay’
Here is a tip. No one likes to pay. Particularly not overpriced fashion that is made by slave labor in China.
Except they’re actually influencers who can make your brand
I think we need to stop giving so much free shit to celebrities in general.
Itās called free advertising. Itās seen on celebrities and then purchased by the WAGs of c-suites. Welcome to the fashion industry, you must be new here.Ā
Oh that kind of rich people are def more tacky than us normal poor human being.
Not sure why she did this.
Celebrity exposure is a massive part of the fashion industry and it can move the needle for brands in a way that is unmatched by any other form of marketing.
But letās just take that out of the equation-
Is there a reason Kelly could not have a formal, written manifesto for celebrities wearing her product that she shared with stylists who contacted her? No one is forced to let celebs borrow things for free, she wanted the exposure which is why she did it.
How is a stylist *asking* if their A list celeb can have free product so offensive that sheās still bitter about it a decade later?
Thatās how the industry works and much of the time itās not exploitative.
Is it cringe for wealthy celebs to ask for free stuff? Sure. Guess who else wants shit for free. Pretty much everybody.
Just as the a-list celebs had to grind to go from unknown to huge star, so do designers. It is what it is. Your market value starts at zero and you grow it through work.
Iād never heard of this woman until today but WOW her calling anything tacky is actually a compliment because her vision is seriously skewed. Iāve never seen anything tackier than her āathleisureā line, her outfits and good lord her wedding. Oh my god are we on candid camera. Iām not even trying to be mean. Her clothing is offensive to the eyes and the soul.
Seems like she had a failed business and married a rich dude. I wonder who wanted her on a podcast? Anyway she just did serious damage to any future aspirations but I get the feeling she doesnāt have any.
Also worth noting she is a āproud republicanā
I remember reading a story a few decades ago about Sharon Stone going into a store grabbing a fur coat and was about to walk out with it, when she was told to pay for it.
She dropped it on the floor and left.