Tate brothers lose court bid to be told names of their UK accusers

    Posted by HimelTy

    Share.

    11 Comments

    1. Can somebody explain how this works? Does a person accused of a certain kind of misconduct never know the identity of the accuser?

    2. Good, what were they going to do with that information anyway besides further abuse and stalk the victims.

      These men never should have been let free, they are dangers to women and society.

    3. totallycalledla-a on

      >Mr Justice Chamberlain said “the claimants have no rights under any relevant statutory regime to be told of the identities of the complainants” at this stage in proceedings.

      At this stage. They’re going to have to tell them eventually so they can build a defense as hard as that is to stomach. No matter how awful the allegation or accused we do have to let people defend themselves. I just hope proper security/protection can be arranged for them when that time comes. God bless them, they’re extremely brave.

    4. Life_Paramedic_4399 on

      Good, they’re disgusting and should not be allowed to know the names of their accusers to intimidate them.

    5. Looking forward to seeing these men in a jail cell or obituary. Absolute scum of the earth. 

    6. They’ve already sicced MAGA influencers on one of their accusers, so I don’t doubt they have plans to do it again.

    7. actuallywaffles on

      Damn, they’ve abused so many women they can’t even keep track of the names of them all.

    8. wrigleysmom420 on

      the accusers were likely granted temporary restraining orders and any retaliation on them would be ANOTHER criminal offense for the tate brothers

      i hope they get locked up for a long fucking time

    9. Lloydbanks88 on

      Wild that Manosphere Patti and Selma can’t narrow down who their accusers are themselves.