Yes, well, we didn't volunteer anything (actually). It was a package deal with fine print in a war country from 1776 to 2026 ( so far). The issue is a man that is assertive in the human population's good intentions destruction. Today, we know an instigator that was a dictator in another life is intent on dictating eviction for anything or anyone he has unfamiliar interest in. Please pray for the Universe to pass judgment for us, the underdogs.
And why would CNN not want this aired on their station? Like most of us we love our country but disagree with the moron running it. I recall a lot of the MAGA had fuck Biden flags and fuck your feelings stickers but nobody told them to love it or leave it…
Sit on the Fence Dave . That was a Easy Way Out . By Not Standing Up for a President that is Standing Up for You & Americans , it shows you're a Coward . CNN is a Radical Left Wing Propaganda Organization . Pathetic !!!!
I did not see c n n in clap , back or say they wanted him to stop talking. Many of us ( liberals) what the same thing that garbage like makes it really hard. He didn't say anything that C.N.N doesn't agree with or any other american citizen wouldn't agree with
Our country who are the original Americans, we the blacks, we were renamed colored people, negroes are the original Americans been here for thousands of years.
black men are 6% of the population but commit over 50% of just the violent crimes. Acording to peer reviewed studies based on IQ the answer is yes, every generation humanity has been losing a few IQ points collectively. At least for the last few hundred years. The causes are many but the researchers postulate it's due to higher IQ people drifting upwards socially and having fewer children whereas lower IQ individuals for various reasons have more children per capita and so eventually crowd out the higher IQ genes. Researchers presume IQ is at least 80% genetic based on studies using adopted separated twins and other large demographic pools. Adopted children tend to be more like their biological parents statically significantly enough to postulate IQ or intelligence largely relies on genetics or inheritance. Behavior also is thought to similarly be genetic since breeds of dogs tend to behave in characteristic measurable ways. The same is true with human neonates (babies). For example Black, Asian, and White babies when having their nose temporarily covered by researchers would all cry but the Asian baby would cease soon after while the Black and White babies kept crying. This is associated with the higher IQs of Asian cohorts. Whites follow then blacks (Native Amercians are considered an Asian cohort). This is thought by some to be due to skull size, an idea allegedly debunked but it turns out that using X-rays to measure the inner skull do show differences external measurements might not. Modern technology vindicated a 19th century hypothesis, namely that behavior and intelligence are largely genetic. There are cases of average or low intelligence parents giving birth to high IQ offspring and vice versa.
Modern medicine also keeps people alive longer or cures them meaning their genes prone to certain illnesses are preserved and passed down when they marry and mate. In bygone ages before the industrial, sanitation, medicine, and agricultral revolutions sometimes up to half of one's offspring died in birth or very young so mutated genes weren't easily passed down. This may explain why certain disease and conditions may becoming more prominent apparently.
There is also environmental damage from pollutants like free radicals that cause genetic mutations to take into consideration.
The original ideas of eugenics was to somehow positively encourage the reproduction or family life of the most qualified citizens in society. The negative methods involved sterilization or worse and eugenics sterilization courts existed for various time periods throughout the developed nations in the early twentieth century including Great Britain and certain US states with the approval of the Supreme Court. The Social Darwinistic approach taken by Nazi Germany and imperial Japan discredited the idea of eugenics and eugenics departments across amercia were rebranded social biology. The communist USSR, China, etc also engaged in their own Darwinsitic eugenics programs to systemicatically eliminate wholesale classes or peoples seen to be enemies of the communist world future monolith. This had a disadvantageous effect on the genetics or stock of their respective populations since higher IQ people who tend to be successful and usually physically equal to their intelligence tend to have upwards social mobility, especially if their societies were meritocracies. So when the Khmer Rouge communist guerrillas took over Cambodia and ordered the death of all upper class persons and anyone who had glasses because it suggested they could read, it had a genetic impact on society. Not that many communist societies weren't previously oppressed but the extreme measures they took in line with the ideologies of the day, namely Social Darwinism and nationalism or communism, meant the future of their societies would be adversely affected as reflected in lower IQs as measured by IQ rests for what they are worth, but certainly there is a correlation to intelligence since high scorers also tend to be successful in life, presumably a correlation of intelligence.
Is that good or bad? One might say that's neither here nor there. As God or Krishna says in Bhagavad Gita, it is very hard to change one's nature they are born with unless by the mercy of God or a holy man or saint. Behavior inherited from desires and actions of previous lives in other bodies both human or even animal or plant. Ian Stevenson former chair of psychology at U Penn did hundreds of case studies on past life reincarnation memories, researching alleged past lives such as places and persons and testing the latter as well as the case study themselves and came to believe something seems to pass from one life to another. Dare we say the soul? Consciousness is eternal like a fermion or boson quarks, or an electron, all the fundamental, irreducible, indestructible particles, as far as we know at least. The conscious self or soul is a similar infinitimsally small particle of awareness. One can understand consciousness is different from the brain or senses because pain or pleasure can't be programmed into a machine. Only the illusion of them since a robot is just the sum of its parts. Humans in the other hand experience a unified gestalt. In other words all the parts of the bodies or cells or atoms don't individually experience emotions or thoughts. How would that work, and how could they cause consciousness to arise? Some philosophers or scientists hypothesize that conciousness is emergent from different systems of sense perceptions working together to synchronize and create the singular conscious experience of "I". Yet the phsycal senses are nothing more than neurons sending electrical signals back and forth to the brain. No where during this process is it necessary to bring in the idea of consciousness. Yet we have singular awareness of what our senses register. Just as a computer can't be programmed to experience pleasure or pain, neither can the brain. Consciousness is qualitatively or categorically a different form of energy to matter, just as bosons and fermion quarks differ from each other but also fundmental, the building blocks of physical reality.
Some materialist philosophers postulate that somehow all atoms have some sort of primordial consciousness which they don't explain what exactly it is made of or how it works. What would an atom be aware of exactly? But nonetheless sidestepping this messy metaphysical problem they jump to the hypothesis that collectively these atoms can unite and form our indivudal consciousness, but again they never explain the details as to how this would happen. Pan Psychism, the name given to this hypothesis of conscious atoms forming unified consciousness, fails to explain the details as to how consciousness would emerge from disparate material parts any more than a room ful of students would become one person. The idea of a fundamental particle or quark of consciousness colloquially called a soul is more congenial as per occam's razor.
42 Comments
Joint in hand!
He wanted to say great again but stopped
Classic 😁…..& True 😂
if you think the world is something you want to see then open your eyes and look in the mirror because you are your world and no other. ❤
Crime-Free defined no one desires to commit a crime.
75 million of my countrymen do not give a shit about kids getting raped, or trump covering it up. This place is full of monsters.
Truth is Dave Chappelle has more intelligents than most of the people you watch on TV in the news
Better than the Mayor of New York City…
Yes, well, we didn't volunteer anything (actually). It was a package deal with fine print in a war country from 1776 to 2026 ( so far). The issue is a man that is assertive in the human population's good intentions destruction. Today, we know an instigator that was a dictator in another life is intent on dictating eviction for anything or anyone he has unfamiliar interest in. Please pray for the Universe to pass judgment for us, the underdogs.
The question 100% ai
Dave for the win, lmao hell yeh
Is the one anchor dressed as Jeffry estein , or is that just me
….and Americans will believe that shite.
San Marino is the oldest republic on earth.
I'd have thought freedom of speech considering his talents would be worthless without it.
No matter what the media tells you we love our fellow Americans, no matter the race, religion, sex, legal status, sexual orientation
Freedom of speech goes a long way also. 😊
And why would CNN not want this aired on their station? Like most of us we love our country but disagree with the moron running it. I recall a lot of the MAGA had fuck Biden flags and fuck your feelings stickers but nobody told them to love it or leave it…
J…je..jeffrey??
Why wouldn't CNN want it on its network?
David didn't want to lose his income with MAGA.
Two gay privileged hateful democrats hoping they can weaponize a black man for their agenda and it backfires
Sit on the Fence Dave . That was a Easy Way Out .
By Not Standing Up for a President that is Standing Up for You & Americans , it shows you're a Coward .
CNN is a Radical Left Wing Propaganda Organization .
Pathetic !!!!
Dave Chapelle is a down to earth dude it seems,pretty cool 😎
WHY WOULD YOU ASK ME THAT ? 😂
CNN COMMIE NEWS NETWORK
I did not see c n n in clap , back or say they wanted him to stop talking. Many of us ( liberals) what the same thing that garbage like makes it really hard. He didn't say anything that C.N.N doesn't agree with or any other american citizen wouldn't agree with
Dave always delivers.
Our country who are the original Americans, we the blacks, we were renamed colored people, negroes are the original Americans been here for thousands of years.
YOU ARE AMERICAN BUT FIRST YOU ARE U.S. CITIZEN.. AMERICA IS WAY BIGGER THAT U.S.
America's government has always sucked pretty much maybe not in the beginning but pretty much sucks the people have made America great
black men are 6% of the population but commit over 50% of just the violent crimes.
Acording to peer reviewed studies based on IQ the answer is yes, every generation humanity has been losing a few IQ points collectively. At least for the last few hundred years. The causes are many but the researchers postulate it's due to higher IQ people drifting upwards socially and having fewer children whereas lower IQ individuals for various reasons have more children per capita and so eventually crowd out the higher IQ genes. Researchers presume IQ is at least 80% genetic based on studies using adopted separated twins and other large demographic pools. Adopted children tend to be more like their biological parents statically significantly enough to postulate IQ or intelligence largely relies on genetics or inheritance. Behavior also is thought to similarly be genetic since breeds of dogs tend to behave in characteristic measurable ways. The same is true with human neonates (babies). For example Black, Asian, and White babies when having their nose temporarily covered by researchers would all cry but the Asian baby would cease soon after while the Black and White babies kept crying. This is associated with the higher IQs of Asian cohorts. Whites follow then blacks (Native Amercians are considered an Asian cohort). This is thought by some to be due to skull size, an idea allegedly debunked but it turns out that using X-rays to measure the inner skull do show differences external measurements might not. Modern technology vindicated a 19th century hypothesis, namely that behavior and intelligence are largely genetic. There are cases of average or low intelligence parents giving birth to high IQ offspring and vice versa.
Modern medicine also keeps people alive longer or cures them meaning their genes prone to certain illnesses are preserved and passed down when they marry and mate. In bygone ages before the industrial, sanitation, medicine, and agricultral revolutions sometimes up to half of one's offspring died in birth or very young so mutated genes weren't easily passed down. This may explain why certain disease and conditions may becoming more prominent apparently.
There is also environmental damage from pollutants like free radicals that cause genetic mutations to take into consideration.
The original ideas of eugenics was to somehow positively encourage the reproduction or family life of the most qualified citizens in society. The negative methods involved sterilization or worse and eugenics sterilization courts existed for various time periods throughout the developed nations in the early twentieth century including Great Britain and certain US states with the approval of the Supreme Court. The Social Darwinistic approach taken by Nazi Germany and imperial Japan discredited the idea of eugenics and eugenics departments across amercia were rebranded social biology. The communist USSR, China, etc also engaged in their own Darwinsitic eugenics programs to systemicatically eliminate wholesale classes or peoples seen to be enemies of the communist world future monolith. This had a disadvantageous effect on the genetics or stock of their respective populations since higher IQ people who tend to be successful and usually physically equal to their intelligence tend to have upwards social mobility, especially if their societies were meritocracies. So when the Khmer Rouge communist guerrillas took over Cambodia and ordered the death of all upper class persons and anyone who had glasses because it suggested they could read, it had a genetic impact on society. Not that many communist societies weren't previously oppressed but the extreme measures they took in line with the ideologies of the day, namely Social Darwinism and nationalism or communism, meant the future of their societies would be adversely affected as reflected in lower IQs as measured by IQ rests for what they are worth, but certainly there is a correlation to intelligence since high scorers also tend to be successful in life, presumably a correlation of intelligence.
Is that good or bad? One might say that's neither here nor there. As God or Krishna says in Bhagavad Gita, it is very hard to change one's nature they are born with unless by the mercy of God or a holy man or saint. Behavior inherited from desires and actions of previous lives in other bodies both human or even animal or plant. Ian Stevenson former chair of psychology at U Penn did hundreds of case studies on past life reincarnation memories, researching alleged past lives such as places and persons and testing the latter as well as the case study themselves and came to believe something seems to pass from one life to another. Dare we say the soul? Consciousness is eternal like a fermion or boson quarks, or an electron, all the fundamental, irreducible, indestructible particles, as far as we know at least. The conscious self or soul is a similar infinitimsally small particle of awareness. One can understand consciousness is different from the brain or senses because pain or pleasure can't be programmed into a machine. Only the illusion of them since a robot is just the sum of its parts. Humans in the other hand experience a unified gestalt. In other words all the parts of the bodies or cells or atoms don't individually experience emotions or thoughts. How would that work, and how could they cause consciousness to arise? Some philosophers or scientists hypothesize that conciousness is emergent from different systems of sense perceptions working together to synchronize and create the singular conscious experience of "I". Yet the phsycal senses are nothing more than neurons sending electrical signals back and forth to the brain. No where during this process is it necessary to bring in the idea of consciousness. Yet we have singular awareness of what our senses register. Just as a computer can't be programmed to experience pleasure or pain, neither can the brain. Consciousness is qualitatively or categorically a different form of energy to matter, just as bosons and fermion quarks differ from each other but also fundmental, the building blocks of physical reality.
Some materialist philosophers postulate that somehow all atoms have some sort of primordial consciousness which they don't explain what exactly it is made of or how it works. What would an atom be aware of exactly? But nonetheless sidestepping this messy metaphysical problem they jump to the hypothesis that collectively these atoms can unite and form our indivudal consciousness, but again they never explain the details as to how this would happen. Pan Psychism, the name given to this hypothesis of conscious atoms forming unified consciousness, fails to explain the details as to how consciousness would emerge from disparate material parts any more than a room ful of students would become one person. The idea of a fundamental particle or quark of consciousness colloquially called a soul is more congenial as per occam's razor.
Wtf, is that Jeff Epstein?
Beautiful answer 👏 Dave the 🐐
He didn't really answer…did he?
Tht is NOT Chappell …. wtf?!
Haha, damn y’all are dumb. Chapelle takes a jab at Trump and you all think it’s pro MAGA.
How could any American be proud of America right now in this nightmare of times.
Much respect for Dave. Thank you so very much.
Love Dave ❤ what a great answer!!!
I am a Black that served in the Marine Corps. Dave is a good comedian BUT that reply was not it.
Ok not sure what that means but I think he meant well
CNN is fine with it. Reel the bait back in. Dave”s answer was honest and positive. 🇺🇸
This guy speaks just beautifully