Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn Pinterest Bluesky Reddit Threads Kim Kardashian’s $5billion SKIMS empire sued by small-time designer who claims it hijacked her name and swamped her business Posted by SwordfishAdvanced468
NefariousGooch on May 1, 2026 7:02 pm Regardless of your opinion on the Kardashians, malicious and frivolous lawsuits like this should be struck down hard and fast.
morelsupporter on May 1, 2026 7:10 pm the company suing SKIMS is called “fits everybody to a t” and they’re suing because skims has a collection called “fits everybody” a phrase which is trademarked by skims i’m not a kardashian apologist, but this seems like a non-starter.
Silly-Moose6422 on May 1, 2026 7:17 pm Off topic, but remember when she was going to call it “Kimono” and they changed it after backlash from the Japanese community?
ImLaunchpadMcQuack on May 1, 2026 7:28 pm Very normal to sue 7+ years later. I’m gonna guess Kim is the one with the trademark to use this name in the correct categories. It’s not her fault if someone else didn’t do their business diligence.
Monday0987 on May 1, 2026 7:52 pm TIL Skims was using “fits everybody”. I don’t think there is a conflict here.
Demonkey44 on May 1, 2026 8:43 pm It’S KIM’S Sure. I don’t know why anyone would name a clothing brand something so boring that reminds you of diet milk, but that’s all I can figure out. Brand it after herself. I’m not sure they have a claim here.
HighlyOffensive10 on May 1, 2026 9:29 pm Damn the Kardashian/Jenner lawyers are booked and blessed this 2026.
13 Comments
Regardless of your opinion on the Kardashians, malicious and frivolous lawsuits like this should be struck down hard and fast.
erm so no.
the company suing SKIMS is called “fits everybody to a t”
and they’re suing because skims has a collection called “fits everybody”
a phrase which is trademarked by skims
i’m not a kardashian apologist, but this seems like a non-starter.
I’m more surprised that Skims is worth 5 billion?
Off topic, but remember when she was going to call it “Kimono” and they changed it after backlash from the Japanese community?
This seems like an excuse to sue the Kardashians lol
Very normal to sue 7+ years later.
I’m gonna guess Kim is the one with the trademark to use this name in the correct categories.
It’s not her fault if someone else didn’t do their business diligence.
Kim has been studying law, there’s no way she loses.
TIL Skims was using “fits everybody”. I don’t think there is a conflict here.
When is America going to be tougher on frivolous lawsuits
It’S KIM’S
Sure. I don’t know why anyone would name a clothing brand something so boring that reminds you of diet milk, but that’s all I can figure out.
Brand it after herself. I’m not sure they have a claim here.
Damn the Kardashian/Jenner lawyers are booked and blessed this 2026.
$5 billion???